1
$\begingroup$

Suppose I find a $1/2$ spin particle in the eigenstate of the observable $\hat S_x$ relative to the eigenvalue $\hbar / 2$. I will use the short-hand notation $ \vert \uparrow_x \rangle$.

The goal is to express it in terms of the eigenstates of the observable $\hat S_z$: $\{ \vert \uparrow_z \rangle, \vert \downarrow_z \rangle\}$.

I have to solve the linear system: $$ \left\{ \begin{aligned} &\vert \uparrow_x \rangle = \alpha \vert \uparrow_z \rangle + \beta \vert \downarrow_z \rangle \\ &\vert \downarrow_x \rangle = \alpha' \vert \uparrow_z\rangle + \beta' \vert \downarrow_z \rangle \end{aligned}\right. $$

The condition of normalization $\langle \uparrow_x \vert \uparrow_x \rangle = \langle \downarrow_x \vert \downarrow_x \rangle = 1$ returns $|\alpha|^2 + |\beta|^2 = |\alpha'|^2 + |\beta'|^2 = 1 $, while the ortogonality, $\langle \uparrow_x \vert \downarrow_x \rangle = \langle \downarrow_x \vert \uparrow_x \rangle = 0$ implies $\bar{\alpha}\alpha' + \bar{\beta}\beta' = \bar{\alpha}'\alpha + \bar{\beta}'\beta = 0$.

Now, here comes the problem. Using the identity $[S_+, S_-] = 2 \hbar S_z$ I could write $$ [S_+, S_-]\vert \uparrow_x \rangle = 2 \hbar S_z \vert \uparrow_x \rangle $$ expanding the commutator $$ \begin{aligned} (S_+S_- - \require{cancel}\cancel{S_-S_+}) \vert \uparrow_x \rangle = \hbar ^2 \vert \uparrow_x \rangle \end{aligned} $$ I end up with $$\frac{\hbar}{2}\vert \uparrow_x \rangle = S_x\vert \uparrow_x \rangle = S_z\vert \uparrow_x \rangle $$

But it can't be! I have been checking it for quite a while, but I still don't know what went wrong.

$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe $\hat S_+$ vanishes only with $\vert \uparrow_z \rangle $, but I'm not sure $\endgroup$
    – ric.san
    Commented Sep 12, 2021 at 17:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @VladimirKalitvianski I think it's the same subspace, represented by different bases. They are not orthogonal one another $\endgroup$
    – ric.san
    Commented Sep 12, 2021 at 17:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related : Understanding the Bloch sphere. The space of states of a spin-1/2 particle is a Hilbert space. Each one of the sets $\{\vert \uparrow_z \rangle,\vert \downarrow_z \rangle\}$,$\{\vert \uparrow_y \rangle,\vert \downarrow_y \rangle\}$, $\{\vert \uparrow_x \rangle,\vert \downarrow_x \rangle\}$ is an orthonormal (eigen)basis. See equation (25) and Figure-04 in my answer in above link. $\endgroup$
    – Voulkos
    Commented Sep 12, 2021 at 21:24
  • $\begingroup$ @Vladimir Kalitvianski : I apologize, but I must say that you have a very very wrong view about the Hilbert space of states of a spin-1/2 particle. I am not an expert but I suggest you to correct this view in order to avoid confusion about this stuff in the future. $\endgroup$
    – Voulkos
    Commented Sep 12, 2021 at 22:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Frobenius: I am both of them, just seen from different computers. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 13, 2021 at 16:05

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You are mixing properties that are defined for $|\uparrow_z\rangle $ with those defined for $|\uparrow_x\rangle $. The right relations are $$S_z|\uparrow_z\rangle = \frac\hbar2 |\uparrow_z\rangle;$$ $$S_z|\downarrow_z\rangle = -\frac\hbar2 |\downarrow_z\rangle,$$ and thus $$S_z|\uparrow_x\rangle = \alpha\frac\hbar2 |\uparrow_z\rangle-\beta \frac\hbar2 |\downarrow_z\rangle .$$

The other one that is wrong is that you assumed $S_+|\uparrow_x\rangle =0$ which is not, the right condition is $S_+|\uparrow_z\rangle =0$ and $S_+|\downarrow_z\rangle =\hbar|\uparrow_z\rangle$ . Which leads to

$$S_+|\uparrow_x\rangle= \cancel{\alpha S_+|\uparrow_z\rangle} +\beta S_+|\downarrow_z\rangle=\beta\hbar|\uparrow_z\rangle.$$ The rest you can work it out if you work only on the $|\updownarrow_z\rangle$ basis.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.