0
$\begingroup$

Suppose we make a measurement in a real/virtual experiment for which the noise is given by a white noise (Gaussian) model. Suppose also that we have a very good filter or machine learning (ML) model to fit this data. Can the filter (or ML model) accurately cancel out the noise? I think there should be a hard region of the white noise model where the filter (or ML model) will have difficulty predicting? If we consider a Gaussian model, we find that the probability of the noise being in a range $[-0.5\sigma_n, 0.5\sigma_n]$, where $\sigma_n$ is the standard deviation of the Gaussian (noise), is about $40\%$ (see for example here ). I believe that this represents the best region to delineate, where the filer (or the ML model) will find the lowest estimate of the noise to signal ratio. As we go outside, i.e., for the rest of the 60%, the noise to signal ratio will gradually increase making the distinguishability more and more difficult. I am wondering if it is possible to derive some theoretical predictions (some kinds of difficulty bounds) with respect to $\sigma_n$, where the signal represents a Gaussian distribution of standard deviation $\sigma_s$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know what you mean by "difficulty bounds", but it seems like you just need to determine the signal-to-noise ratio or some similar statistic. $\endgroup$
    – Paul T.
    Commented Jul 3, 2021 at 20:12
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @Paul T. for the comment. I have edited the question a bit. Thanks $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 4, 2021 at 3:43

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

When you assume that your noise is white normal, then its spectrum (spectral density) $S_0(u)$ is constant frequency independent, $S_0(u)=\frac{1}{2}\mathcal N _0$ for all $u$, and if passed through a linear time invariant filter characterized by the impulse response $h(t)$ whose Fourier Transform is $H(u)$, the transfer function, then when $h(t)$ is driven by white noise the output spectrum of the filter will be $S_1(u)=|H(u)|^2S_0(u)$ and its total noise power (variance) is $$P_1 = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |H(u)|^2S_0(u)du \\ =\mathcal N _0\int_{0}^{\infty} |H(u)|^2du$$

For a real normalized $h(t)$, $H(u)=\bar H(-u)$ and $\max_{u} |H(u)|=1$, we define its "noise bandwidth" by $B=\int_0^\infty |H(u)|^2du$. Then the variance $P_1$ of the output noise is $P_1 = \mathcal{N}_0 B$ and we see that for fixed input noise density $\mathcal {N}_0$ the the output noise variance $P_1$ is directly proportional with filter's noise bandwidth $B$.

For white normal input noise that is measured in an infinitesimal bandwidth $\Delta u$ around the frequency $u$ has normal probability distribution $\mathcal {G}(0,\sigma ^2):p(X)= \rm{exp}\big(\frac{-X^2}{2\sigma ^2}\big)$ with $\sigma ^2 =\mathcal {N}_0 |H(U)|^2 \Delta u $. The total output distribution is also normal $\mathcal {G}(0,P_1)$ with $P_1=\mathcal {N}_0 B$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @physics.stackexchange.com/users/31748/hyportnex for the prompt answer. Could you please provide some reference materials related to it? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 4, 2021 at 3:47
  • $\begingroup$ almost any book on analog/digital communications will have a chapter on this but the classic is this ieeexplore.ieee.org/book/5265617 $\endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    Commented Jul 4, 2021 at 16:49
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much for the very precise reference hyportnex. I think I can find the answer from here. Thanks $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 5, 2021 at 1:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.