3
$\begingroup$

First things first, this question is different from the one I posted here, the coefficients I've found in this link are wrong, but the right coefficients suffer from the same strange relation:

\begin{align} |\alpha_{p,k;r_s,\infty}| &\propto |\omega_k+\omega_p|e^{\frac{1}{2}\pi\omega_p r_s} \\ |\beta_{p,k;r_s,\infty}| &\propto |\omega_k-\omega_p|e^{-\frac{1}{2}\pi\omega_p r_s} \end{align} With the same proportionality factor. So in the coordinate system I use, we don't have $|\alpha_{\omega,\omega'}|=e^{\pi\omega r_s}|\beta_{\omega,\omega'}|$

From this article (An Introduction to Black Hole Evaporation, Jennie Traschen) and from the original article of Hawking on his radiations, we can see that the tortoise coordinates and null coordinates/null Kruskal coordinates are used and then give the wright relation between the Bogoliubov coefficients.

In fact, it seems to me that the very structure of Bogoliubov coefficients can't give the relation $|\alpha_{\omega,\omega'}|=e^{\pi\omega r_s}|\beta_{\omega,\omega'}|$ in spherical coordinates, since in these we necessarily have $\Phi=e^{i\omega t}\phi(r)Y_l^m(\theta,\varphi)$.

So my question is: Is the Hawking radiation a coordinate dependent phenomenon?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The short answer is no, the Hawking radiation is not a coordinate dependent phenomenon. These (Kruskal-Szekeres and Tortoise) coordinates simplify the problem significantly when you are dealing with QFT in curved spacetime background (here Schwarzschild black hole background). Physically, any static observer at infinity would detect the same Hawking radiation rate. This also can be verified by use of the explicit form of Hawking radiation in terms of surface gravity ($\kappa$), i.e.,

$${T_{\rm{H}}} = \frac{\kappa }{{2\pi }}\,\,{\rm{where}}\,\,\kappa = \sqrt { - \frac{1}{2}({\nabla _\mu }{\xi _\nu })({\nabla ^\mu }{\xi ^\nu })}, $$ where $\xi _\nu$ is the Killing vector field satisfying the Killing equation, ${\nabla _\mu }{\xi _\nu } + {\nabla _\nu }{\xi _\mu } = 0$. Killing fields are the infinitesimal generators of isometries and each of them corresponds to a quantity which is conserved along geodesics. Obviously, this definition does not depend on the coordinates one is dealing with.

To make it more clear:

Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates have the advantage that they are well-behaved everywhere outside the physical singularity. In addition, they cover the entire spacetime manifold of the maximally extended Schwarzschild solution. For these reasons, KS coordinates which describes the entire spacetime are suitable for any observer freely falling through the horizon.

Tortoise coordinates are just suitable for a remote observer/frame at fixed location in black hole background since when an observer approaches a black hole event horizon, its Schwarzschild time coordinate grows infinite. The outgoing null rays in this coordinate system have an infinite change in $t$ on travelling out from the horizon. The tortoise coordinate is intended to grow infinite at the appropriate rate such as to cancel out this singular behavior in coordinate systems constructed from it.

Generally, in order to derive the Hawking temperature, you need to consider quantum fields from the viewpoints of different observers since there is no unique mode decomposition of the quantum fields. This is the main idea. The problem is to find the physical, well-behaved coordinates free from pathological properties. If you can construct such coordinates, you will find the same relation for the Hawking radiation.

$\endgroup$
11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The point is that different observers will decompose the quantum fields in different momentum modes. So, first you need to construct a static frame with respect to the black hole for a remote observer and then you need to determine an appropriate metric for a freely falling frame near/crossing the event horizon. These two coordinate frames must overlap outside the black hole's event horizon. Having this property, Bogolyubov transformations can be defined. $\endgroup$
    – SG8
    Commented Apr 10, 2021 at 15:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for your comments! From another article, I saw that when a solution is known, no need for a Bogoliubov transformation, there's another method.. I think you are right when you say that the Bogoliubov Transformation is ill-defined for an ill-defined coordinate system at the horizon: The field itself is ill-defined, as shown by the solutions I've found in my previous post I've linked, and by the article I gave you. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 10, 2021 at 15:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, the Hawking radiation has been derived in many different ways and we here discussed about its traditional derivation. For example, this effect has been derived by use of the renormalized energy-momentum tensor of quantum field in black hole background. My favorite approach is the Euclidean field theory, in which, in the middle of evaluating the partition function of black hole, the black hole temperature (Hawking radiation) is found straightforwardly. In fact, this is the source of Euclidean trick for obtaining the Hawking radiation. I'm sure there are other approaches. $\endgroup$
    – SG8
    Commented Apr 10, 2021 at 16:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @safesphere, Black hole metric (solution) is different from the black hole coordinates. For example, Schwarzschild metric is the only solution to the Einstein field equations in vacuum with spherical symmetry (Birkhoff's theorem). But, the Schwarzschild solution can be expressed in a range of different choices of coordinates besides the Schwarzschild coordinates, e.g. Eddington–Finkelstein coordinates, Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates, Tortoise coordinates etc. The subject of this discussion is about the different coordinates which cover/describe a certain black hole background. $\endgroup$
    – SG8
    Commented Apr 10, 2021 at 22:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @safesphere, To be more specific, in this discussion, we were talking about detecting Hawking radiation by a static, remote observer in a specific (Schwarzschild) black hole background. He/She would always detect the same value (for Schwarzschild case we always have ${T_{\rm{H}}} = \frac{\kappa }{{2\pi }} = \frac{1}{{8\pi M}}$, no doubt!). Physically, this means that all observers located at the rest far away from the black hole would detect the same Hawking radiation. However, they may choose different (appropriate) coordinates for describing the black hole spacetime. $\endgroup$
    – SG8
    Commented Apr 10, 2021 at 22:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.