2
$\begingroup$

The equation in the title can be found in Nakahara's book, page 507 (chapter 13, Anomalies in Gauge Field Theories) and in Fujikawa's book, pages 69 and 78 (chapter 5, The Jacobian in Path Integrals and Quantum Anomalies). However, when I try to derive this equation, using the trick $BA=\frac{1}{2}\{B,A\}+\frac{1}{2}[B,A]$, I get an extra term: \begin{align*} &(\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu)(\nabla_\mu\nabla_\nu)=\frac{1}{2}\big(\{\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu\}+[\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu]\big)\frac{1}{2}\big(\{\nabla_\mu,\nabla_\nu\}+[\nabla_\mu,\nabla_\nu]\big)&\\ &=\underbrace{\frac{1}{4}\{\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu\}\{\nabla_\mu,\nabla_\nu\}+\frac{1}{4}\{\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu\}[\nabla_\mu,\nabla_\nu]}_{\frac{1}{2}\{\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu\}\nabla_\mu\nabla_\nu=\eta^{\mu\nu}\nabla_\mu\nabla_\nu=\nabla_\mu\nabla^\mu}+\frac{1}{4}[\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu]\{\nabla_\mu,\nabla_\nu\}+\frac{1}{4}[\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu]\underbrace{[\nabla_\mu,\nabla_\nu]}_{=F_{\mu\nu}}&\\ &=\nabla_\mu\nabla^\mu+\underbrace{\frac{1}{4}[\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}]\{\nabla_\mu,\nabla_\nu\}}_{\text{extra term}}+\frac{1}{4}[\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}]F_{\mu\nu}& \end{align*}

Is the "extra term" zero for some reason or is $\nabla^\mu$ defined in a different way (I assumed $\nabla^\mu=\eta^{\mu\nu}\nabla_\nu$)?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ If I am not mistaken $[\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu]$ is an antisymmetric tensor contracted with a symmetric tensor $\{\nabla_\mu,\nabla_\nu\}$ and therefore yields 0. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 31, 2021 at 13:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @krabbypatty You are right, thank you! I'm drafting an answer. $\endgroup$
    – Filippo
    Commented Mar 31, 2021 at 13:32

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Let $P\to M$ be a principal $G$-bundle with a representation $\rho\colon G\to\mathrm{GL}(V)$.

The "extra term" is the endomorphism $O\colon C^{\infty}(M,\Delta\otimes V)\to C^{\infty}(M,\Delta\otimes V)$ defined by \begin{equation} O(\psi)=[\gamma^k,\gamma^l]\cdot\{\nabla_k,\nabla_l\}(\psi)=\sum_{k,l}[\gamma^k,\gamma^l]\cdot\{\nabla_k,\nabla_l\}(\psi). \end{equation} We prove $O=-O$ (which is equivalent to $O=0$):

Since $[A,B]=-[B,A]$ and $\{A,B\}=\{B,A\}$, \begin{equation} O(\psi)=[\gamma^k,\gamma^l]\cdot\{\nabla_k,\nabla_l\}(\psi)=-[\gamma^l,\gamma^k]\cdot\{\nabla_l,\nabla_k\}(\psi)=-O(\psi) \end{equation} for all $\psi\in C^{\infty}(M,\Delta\otimes V)$.

(To be precise, we would have to replace $\gamma^\mu$ by $\gamma^\mu\otimes 1$.)

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Can you explain what this object $\Delta \otimes V$ represents? $\endgroup$
    – DanielC
    Commented Mar 31, 2021 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielC I'm glad you ask this (I was afraid to add too much information). I learnt gauge theory with the help of Hamilton's book. In chapter 5.9, he defines the covariant derivative in a very general setting: Principal $G$-bundle $P\to M$ + a representation $\rho\colon G\to\mathrm{GL}(V)$ + a connection 1-form $A\in\Omega^1(M)\otimes g$. If $M$ is endowed with a spin structure $S$ $\endgroup$
    – Filippo
    Commented Mar 31, 2021 at 15:27
  • $\begingroup$ (that's a principal $\mathrm{Spin}$-bundle with a representation $\kappa\colon\mathrm{Spin}\to\mathrm{GL}(\Delta)$, where $\Delta$ is the complex vector space of spinors, see chapter 6.9). We can form the fiber product $P\times S$ of $P$ and $S$ (remark 6.12.7), which is a principal $G\times\mathrm{Spin}$-bundle. Using $\rho$ and $\kappa$, we can construct a representation $G\times\mathrm{Spin}\to\mathrm{GL}(\Delta\times V)$ and obtain an associated vector bundle $E$. $\endgroup$
    – Filippo
    Commented Mar 31, 2021 at 15:27
  • $\begingroup$ The Dirac operator is an endomorphism $D\colon\Gamma(M,E)\to\Gamma(M,E)$ and if $\Psi\in\Gamma(M,E)$ and $s\in\Gamma(U,P\times S)$ is a local gauge, there is (exactly one) $\psi\in C^{\infty}(M,\Delta\otimes V)$ s.t. $\Psi|_U=[s,\psi]$ and $D\Psi|_U=[s,D\psi]$, where $D$ is the dirac operator and $D\psi$ is given by the local formula known to physicists (chapter 6.11). In the equation from the title, the spin connection term was dropped from the covariant derivative (that is, I considered a "simplified" version of the dirac operator). $\endgroup$
    – Filippo
    Commented Mar 31, 2021 at 15:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.