I'd start from Ehrenfest theorem,
$$\frac{d\langle{p}\rangle}{dt}=-\left\langle{\frac{dV(x)}{dx}}\right\rangle$$
expanding the right side about $\langle{x}\rangle$,
$$\frac{dV(x)}{dx}=\frac{dV(\langle{x}\rangle)}{d\langle{x}\rangle}+\frac{dV(\langle{x}\rangle)^2}{d\langle{x}\rangle^2}(x-\langle{x}\rangle)+\frac{1}{2}\frac{dV(\langle{x}\rangle)^3}{d\langle{x}\rangle^3}(x-\langle{x}\rangle)^2+\mathcal{O}\left(\langle{x}\rangle^4\right)$$
now, $\langle{x}-\langle{x}\rangle\rangle=0$, and $\langle(x-\langle{x}\rangle)^2\rangle=\sigma_x^2$, so that if $V$ varies slowly on $x$, we may just consider the first terms of the expansion,
$$\frac{d\langle{p}\rangle}{dt}=-\frac{dV(\langle{x}\rangle)}{d\langle{x}\rangle}-\frac{1}{2}\sigma_x^2\frac{dV(\langle{x}\rangle)^3}{d\langle{x}\rangle^3}$$
and now for the variance $\sigma_x^2$ to be neglected, we may suppose that the size of the wave function is much smaller than the variation of the potential $V$. This way we get the desired result
$$\frac{d\langle{p}\rangle}{dt}=-\frac{dV(\langle{x}\rangle)}{d\langle{x}\rangle}$$
We can interpret this as that the spatial extent of each wavefunction, practically meaning the deBroglie wavelength, need be much smaller than the separation of particles, that may represent the source of the potential $V$.