Imagine an ideal pendulum in a train. While the train is in uniform motion, Newton's laws apply within the train, and we can easily write down the equations of motion for the pendulum. Now assume the train is being uniformly accelerated with acceleration $a$.
If we would like to directly approach this using Newton's laws, we would probably have to consider the force accelerating the train, the reaction force on the pivot of the pendulum, and so on. I think this would get quite cumbersome.
Naively invoking the equivalence principle as in general relativity, this would become easy again: let $\vec g$ be the gravitational acceleration, $\vec a$ the acceleration of the train, then in the train this would give us an equivalent gravitational field with uniform value $\vec g - \vec a$, and an equilibrium position in the direction of this vector, which corresponds to the angle $\theta_0 = \arctan\frac{-a}g$, and we conclude that the equation of motion for the angle $\theta - \theta_0$ is the same as that for an ordinary pendulum with gravitational acceleration $\sqrt{g^2 + a^2}$.
It is not at all clear (to me) that this reasoning is justified by Newton's laws.
My questions:
- Can the equivalence principle (possibly in some restricted form) be safely invoked in non-relativisting mechanics?
- Can its validity be derived from Newton's laws?