1
$\begingroup$

Let's consider Maxwell theory:

$$ \mathcal{L} = -F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} = 2 A_\mu (\Box \eta^{\mu\nu} - \partial^\mu \partial^\nu) A_\nu $$

Is it possible to fix gauge $A_0 = 0 $ and concider Lagrangian:

$$ \mathcal{L} = 2 A_i (- \Box \delta^{ij} - \partial^i \partial^j) A_j $$

And do quntization of such theory in Lorentz non-invariant manner? Or there are some other barriers?

More concreatly, is it possible to calculate integration between 2 external charges due to gauge field?

I see obstruction in interaction therm for statical charges $J^\mu = (q_1\delta(\vec r - \vec r_1)+ q_2\delta(\vec r - \vec r_2), 0 , 0, 0)$ interaction therm $A_\mu J^\mu = 0$. Is possible to do such calculation in this gauge?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Even in classical field theory calculation, one cannot just substitute $A_0=0$ in the Lagrangian. Before gauge fixing, $A_0$, being non-dynamical Lagrange-multiplier-like variable, imposes with its EOM a (gauge-invariant) constraint like $div\, \vec{E} = J^0$ (which is the Gauss law). One should remember about this constraint after fixing the gauge to get sensible answers.

I believe that same applies to the quantum case: one should impose Gauss law constraint by hand as a requirement on physical states of the system. As another example of the same problem, recall how for Polyakov action in string theory after fixing the gauge for the $g_{\mu\nu}$ field we get just a system of $d$ massless free bosonic fields. Yet there, this is not the full story, as one should remember about EOMs for the metric, which is $T=0$; only after imposing this constraint we get correct answers.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.