3
$\begingroup$

For a supergravity theory not to have particles with spin greater than 2, all books state that $Q\leq 32$, where $Q$ is the number of fermionic supercharges and for a given dimension $D$ it's related to the number of supersymmetries $\mathcal{N}$ through the number of components of the fundamental spinors in that dimension, $C$ as $Q=\mathcal{N} C$.

Naively, I would expect each supercharge $Q$ to raise or lower the spin of a given particle by $1/2$, as it does in the 4 dimensional case, but I suspect this is not the case in different dimensions (though all the books I have read are pretty confusing, just analyzing $D=4$ in detail using the chiral properties in that dimension and then hand-waving their way to higher dimensions).

If each of the $\mathcal{N}$ supersymmetries could be used once and only once to raise the spin of the states, then I would expect the limit to be $\mathcal{N} \leq 8$ instead of a bound on $Q$, but this is not the case.

According to one of my professors, $Q=32$ is just the consequence of wanting $\mathcal{N}=8$ at the most in 4 dimensions, where $C=4$, so that we can compactify the higher dimensional theory and obtain an acceptable model for our world.

However, the $D=11$ supergravity should only include the graviton in that case, right? And $D=10$ theories would only have the graviton and $\mathcal{N}$ gravitinos, which is not true. So what's the right justification for $Q \leq 32$?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I strongly suspect you should either stick to a good book, or else read up on the original 1978 Cremer-Julia-Scherk paper, possibly going back to Nahm's paper. In 11D, the 8 Majorana gravitini each corresponding to a spin lowering supercharge have $\frac{32}{2}(D-3) \to 128$ d.o.f. Your are using highly nonstandard language. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 7, 2020 at 15:33

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

You have to first understand the contruction of massless multiplets which is found in the beginning of every introduction to supersymmetry, so I won't repeat it here. Then the argument goes like this:

  • Given $Q$ supercharges, half of them will be zero for the massless case, thus leaving you with $Q/2$ non-zero supercharges.

  • From the remaining $Q/2$ supercharges we can construct $Q/4$ lowering operators, and $Q/4$ raising operators.

  • Every raising/lowering operator changes the helicity $\lambda$ by $\pm 1/2$. So avoiding helicities $\lambda$ greater than $|2|$ requires that

\begin{equation} Q/4\leq 8 \end{equation}

Therefore the maximum number of supercharges is $Q=32$ for any supergravity.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much!! That makes a lot of sense. I was a bit confused when thinking of raising and lowering operators, I thought that depending on whether the spinors are chiral or Majorana-Weyl their action would be different. Is it then that for chiral spinors the lowering operators are the adjunct of the raising ones, while for non-chiral theories they are not related? $\endgroup$
    – edmateosg
    Commented Apr 8, 2020 at 23:39
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, and by the way, is this argument enough to know the field content of a theory? For example, in 11D we have the metric, the gravitino and the antisymmetric 3-form. Starting just from a spin-2 massless particle (the metric), how would you know you have to add the other fields? Just counting degrees of freedom and seeing what fits? $\endgroup$
    – edmateosg
    Commented Apr 8, 2020 at 23:50
  • $\begingroup$ It's SuGra, so the graviton and the gravitino come together and you just need to guess the 3-form: 128-44=84. $\endgroup$
    – mmanu F
    Commented Apr 19, 2020 at 19:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.