4
$\begingroup$

I am trying to prove the parity invariance of some terms in a complex scalar field Lagrangian, for example $m^2 \; \phi^* \phi$ or $\partial_{\mu} \phi \;\partial^{\mu} \phi^*$. So what I want to prove is that

$\delta S=0$

for every term I am considering, where $S$ is the action of the theory. So I start from the basic definition of parity

$x^{\mu}=(x_0, \vec{x})\equiv x$,

$x^{\mu} \xrightarrow[]{P} x_{\mu}=(x_0,-\vec{x})\equiv x_p$,

from this follows that the derivative transforms as

$\partial_{\mu} \xrightarrow[]{P} \partial^{\mu} $.

At this point let's consider the complex scalar field $\phi$, if I am correct we have

$\phi(x) \xrightarrow[]{P} \phi(x_p) $

$\phi^*(x) \xrightarrow[]{P} \phi^*(x_p)$

At this point we just have to consider the action $S$ for the mass term

$S \supset \int d^4x \; m^2 \phi^*(x) \phi(x)$

and see how it changes with parity. My doubt is regarding the measure. I think it transforms under parity like

$d^4x \xrightarrow[]{P} d^4x_p$

therefore the transformation of the action term is

$ \int d^4x \; m^2 \phi^*(x) \phi(x) \xrightarrow[]{P} \int \; d^4x_p m^2 \phi^*(x_p) \phi(x_p)$

therefore since the $x_p$ is a dummy variable we proved the invariance. Am I correct? Did I make any mistake?

P.S. $d^4x \xrightarrow[]{P} dx_0 (-dx_1)(-dx_2)(-dx_3) = d^4x_p$

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Seems correct. You can think of the integration measure as integrating from $-\infty$ to $+\infty$ so a transformation from (+) to (-) leaves the integration invariant. As a general rule of thumb, if the Lagrangian density $\mathcal{L}$ is invariant, so is the action $\mathcal{S}$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Actually I think that the last line is incorrect since the measure transforms with the jacobian of the transformation. In this case $d^4x \xrightarrow[]{P} +1 d^4x_p$. But the overall meaning should be the same $\endgroup$
    – TheoPhy
    Commented Jan 16, 2020 at 14:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.