2
$\begingroup$

While reading "An introduction to Quantum Field Theory" by Peskin & Schroeder I came across the following expression for the amplitude of one of the Feynman Diagrams for Compton scattering: $$iM=\bar u(p')(-ie\gamma^\mu)\epsilon^*_\mu(k')\frac{i(\not{p}+\not{k}+m)}{(p+k)^2-m^2}\epsilon_\nu(k)(-ie\gamma^\nu)u(p)$$ for which the authors then write: $$iM=(ie)^2\epsilon^*_\mu(k')\epsilon_\nu(k)\bar u(p')\gamma^\mu\frac{i(\not{p}+\not{k}+m)}{(p+k)^2-m^2}\gamma^\nu u(p)$$

My question is: the photon polarisation are 4-vectors, then how can they be put on the left, while ignoring the $\gamma^\mu$ matrix? Is it because $\epsilon^*_\mu(k')\epsilon_\nu(k)$ is a number? Covariant 4-vectors are column vectors (is this the definition or just a convention?) and therefore $\epsilon^*_\mu(k')\epsilon_\nu(k)$ is the product of a $1\times4$ by a $4\times1$ matrix, giving a number?

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

In QED, there are two sorts of indices going around, which can be understood best by looking at structure of $\gamma^\mu$. Each $\gamma$ matrix ($\gamma^0$, $\gamma^1$, ...) is a $4 \times 4$ matrix acting on the internal degrees of freedom of the electron. On top of this matrix structure, the four matrices are packaged into a contravariant four-vector, $\gamma^\mu$. The photon polarization vectors are also four-vectors, but each of their elements are just numbers. Because they're just numbers, they can be moved past the $\gamma$ matrices.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.