1
$\begingroup$

I am trying to derive the source four velocity for Lorentz boosted frame. If the source four velocity for rest frame is denoted as $U^{\alpha} = (1, \bar 0)$, then how do I write this $U^{\alpha}$ for a Lorentz boosted frame? Also could you please provide a good explanation why we write the four velocity as $(1, \bar 0)$? A good derivation for the boosted frame will also be very helpful for me.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The velocity 4-vector is \begin{equation} \mathbf{U}=\left(\gamma\, c, \gamma\, \mathbf{u}\right) \quad\text{where}\quad \gamma=\left(1-\dfrac{u^2}{c^2}\right)^{\bf -\frac12} \tag{01}\label{eq01} \end{equation} and $\:\mathbf{u}\:$ the velocity 3-vector.

In the rest frame of the particle $\:\mathbf{u}=\boldsymbol{0}\:$ and $\:\gamma=1\:$ so (for $\:c=1\:$) \begin{equation} \mathbf{U}_0=\left(1, \boldsymbol{0}\right) \tag{02}\label{eq02} \end{equation} Obviously $\:\bar 0\:$ is the symbol for the null 3-vector $\:\boldsymbol{0}\:$ and I think that $\:\bar u\:$ would be for the 3-vector $\:\mathbf{u}\:$ in general.


enter image description here

Now, in above Figure-02 an inertial system $\:\mathrm S'\:$ is translated with respect to the inertial system $\:\mathrm S\:$ with constant velocity
\begin{equation} \boldsymbol{\upsilon}=\left(\upsilon_{1},\upsilon_{2},\upsilon_{3}\right)=\left(\upsilon \mathrm n_{1},\upsilon \mathrm n_{2},\upsilon \mathrm n_{3}\right)=\upsilon \mathbf n\,, \qquad \upsilon \in \left(-c,c\right) \tag{03}\label{eq03} \end{equation} The Lorentz transformation is \begin{align} \mathbf{x}^{\boldsymbol{\prime}} & = \mathbf{x}+(\gamma-1)(\mathbf{n}\boldsymbol{\cdot} \mathbf{x})\mathbf{n}-\gamma \boldsymbol{\upsilon}t \tag{04a}\label{eq04a}\\ t^{\boldsymbol{\prime}} & = \gamma\left(t-\dfrac{\boldsymbol{\upsilon}\boldsymbol{\cdot} \mathbf{x}}{c^{2}}\right) \tag{04b}\label{eq04b} \end{align} in differential form \begin{align} \mathrm d\mathbf{x}^{\boldsymbol{\prime}} & = \mathrm d\mathbf{x}+(\gamma-1)(\mathbf{n}\boldsymbol{\cdot} \mathrm d\mathbf{x})\mathbf{n}-\gamma\boldsymbol{\upsilon}\mathrm dt \tag{05a}\label{eq05a}\\ \mathrm d t^{\boldsymbol{\prime}} & = \gamma\left(\mathrm d t-\dfrac{\boldsymbol{\upsilon}\boldsymbol{\cdot} \mathrm d\mathbf{x}}{c^{2}}\right) \tag{05b}\label{eq05b} \end{align} and in matrix form \begin{equation} \mathbf{X}^{\boldsymbol{\prime}}= \begin{bmatrix} \mathbf{x}^{\boldsymbol{\prime}}\vphantom{\dfrac{\gamma\boldsymbol{\upsilon}^{\boldsymbol{\top}}}{c}}\\ c t^{\boldsymbol{\prime}}\vphantom{\dfrac{\gamma\boldsymbol{\upsilon}^{\boldsymbol{\top}}}{c}} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \mathrm I+(\gamma-1)\mathbf{n}\mathbf{n}^{\boldsymbol{\top}} & -\dfrac{\gamma\boldsymbol{\upsilon}}{c} \vphantom{\dfrac{\gamma\boldsymbol{\upsilon}^{\boldsymbol{\top}}}{c}}\\ -\dfrac{\gamma\boldsymbol{\upsilon}^{\boldsymbol{\top}}}{c} & \hphantom{-}\gamma \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \mathbf{x}\vphantom{\dfrac{\gamma\boldsymbol{\upsilon}^{\boldsymbol{\top}}}{c}}\\ c t\vphantom{\dfrac{\gamma\boldsymbol{\upsilon}^{\boldsymbol{\top}}}{c}} \end{bmatrix} =\mathrm L\mathbf{X} \tag{06}\label{eq06} \end{equation} where $\:\mathrm L\:$ the real symmetric $\:4\times 4\:$ matrix \begin{equation} \mathrm L \equiv \begin{bmatrix} \mathrm I+(\gamma-1)\mathbf{n}\mathbf{n}^{\boldsymbol{\top}} & -\dfrac{\gamma\boldsymbol{\upsilon}}{c} \vphantom{\dfrac{\gamma\boldsymbol{\upsilon}^{\boldsymbol{\top}}}{c}}\\ -\dfrac{\gamma\boldsymbol{\upsilon}^{\boldsymbol{\top}}}{c} & \hphantom{-}\gamma \end{bmatrix} \tag{07}\label{eq07} \end{equation} and \begin{equation} \mathbf{n}\mathbf{n}^{\boldsymbol{\top}} = \begin{bmatrix} \mathrm n_{1}\vphantom{\dfrac{}{}}\\ \mathrm n_{2}\vphantom{\dfrac{}{}}\\ \mathrm n_{3}\vphantom{\dfrac{}{}} \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \mathrm n_{1} & \mathrm n_{2} & \mathrm n_{3}\vphantom{\frac12} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} \mathrm n_{1}^{2} & \mathrm n_{1}\mathrm n_{2} & \mathrm n_{1}\mathrm n_{3}\vphantom{\dfrac{}{}}\\ \mathrm n_{2}\mathrm n_{1} & \mathrm n_{2}^{2} & \mathrm n_{2}\mathrm n_{3}\vphantom{\dfrac{}{}}\\ \mathrm n_{3}\mathrm n_{1} & \mathrm n_{3}\mathrm n_{2} & \mathrm n_{3}^{2}\vphantom{\dfrac{}{}} \end{bmatrix} \tag{08}\label{eq08} \end{equation}
a matrix representing the vectorial projection on the direction $\:\mathbf{n}$.

The velocity 3-vector $\:\mathbf{u}\:$ of a particle is transformed as follows \begin{equation} \mathbf{u}^{\boldsymbol{\prime}} = \dfrac{\mathbf{u}+(\gamma-1)(\mathbf{n}\boldsymbol{\cdot} \mathbf{u})\mathbf{n}-\gamma \boldsymbol{\upsilon}}{\gamma \left(1-\dfrac{\boldsymbol{\upsilon}\boldsymbol{\cdot} \mathbf{u}\vphantom{\frac12}}{c^{2}}\right)} \tag{09}\label{eq09} \end{equation} equation proved by dividing equations \eqref{eq05a}, \eqref{eq05b} side by side and setting $\:\mathbf{u}\equiv \mathrm d\mathbf{x}/\mathrm d t\:$, $\:\mathbf{u'}\equiv \mathrm d\mathbf{x'}/\mathrm d t'$.


Hint :

Using above equations and especially \eqref{eq09} try to define a 4-dimensional quantity $\:\mathbf{U}\:$ that would be a (Lorentz) 4-vector and would be used as the velocity 4-vector.


Related : Lorentz transformation of velocity 4-vector.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ @Forbenius i have this result $\frac{\gamma-1}{u^2}\vec{u}\,\vec{u}^T$ is that same what you got? $\endgroup$
    – Eli
    Commented Sep 20, 2018 at 6:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Eli, Precisely : My unit vector $\;\mathbf{n}\;$ is identical to your unit vector$\;\vec{u}/u$. $\endgroup$
    – Voulkos
    Commented Sep 20, 2018 at 6:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.