2
$\begingroup$

what does it mean when experimental physicists refer to an experiments sensitivity? What in general is it compared to (e.g. observation?) Is there a formal definition or does it widely depend on the experiment in question?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Sensitivity refers to the magnitude of change of a measurement outcome for a given change in the measurement input. If a measurement is said to be “sensitive” to some variable, that means changes in the variable will result in changes to the output of the measurement; i.e. you can use the measurement to detect changes in the variable.

There are infinite examples, but consider for now the measurement of a volume of water. You want to pour water into a container, measure its depth, and from that figure out how much water has been added. Compare performing this measurement with (a) a pint glass vs (b) a bath tub. Clearly, the pint glass will give you a much larger sensitivity because the amount the depth changes when you add some more water is inversely proportional to the surface area. If you add a cup of liquid to the bath tub, you won’t be able to tell the difference, but you’ll see a huge difference if you add the cup to the pint glass instead.

But now you see that there are other considerations as well. If you measure the depth a bunch of times, how consistent are your results (“precision”; related to noise, maybe about the same for the bathtub and pint glass if you’re careful)? How much water can my container hold (“dynamic range”; bathtub can measure a larger change in water volume)? How well do I know the dimensions of the container to calculate volume (“calibration”; probably better for the pint glass)? Are there essential problems you need to overcome or correct for the measurement to be accurate (“systematic error”; maybe the tub has a leaky drain, which skews the results)? Etc. The sensitivity and the precision come together to give you a signal-to-noise ratio, which is a primary factor determining how reliably you can make conclusions.

Ultimately, experimental science is a practical thing, and there can be different definitions for these terms depending on the context.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ So basically it refers to how drastic a change in a measurement (external variable/test statistic) with respect to the experiment's internal variables? Consequently, why is enhancing sensitivity of utmost importance? I'm guessing we make conclusions about hypotheses/observations even with low sensitivities, perhaps even no sensitivities at all in some cases, so long as it is testable. $\endgroup$
    – MKF
    Commented Aug 28, 2018 at 18:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.