3
$\begingroup$

Throughout my readings on particle physics, I've encountered a problem with quantum mechanics. Indeed, say we have a transformation given by a unitary operator : $U \rightarrow \psi' = U\psi$ for which the hamiltonian is left invariant, $H' = H$. Is there a way to show that this implies that $[H,U] = 0$, without knowing a priori that $H' = UHU^{\dagger}$ ?

This question comes from the fact that I get $H' = UHU^{\dagger}$ from the Schrodinger equation, although I would think that these symmetry properties might be more general.

$\endgroup$
2

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$
  1. Before you can prove $[H,U]=0$ you certainly have to define what $H'$ is, otherwise the statement $H' = H$ does not have any meaning.

  2. You do not need the Schrödinger equation though in order to understand why $H' = U H U^\dagger$: Say we have a transformation $U$ acting on vectors $\psi$ as $\psi' = U\psi$ and we have the operator $H$ acting on $\psi$. Now we want to write down an operator $H'$ that has the same effect on the transformed $\psi'$ that $H$ has on $\psi$. If you think about this, it should be clear that $$ (H \psi)' = H' \psi' \qquad (\ast) $$ is the condition we are looking for, i.e. $U(H\psi) = H'(U\psi)$. If this is to hold for all $\psi$, we necessarily get $$ H' = U H U^\dagger \;. $$

Note: In more technical terms, we have a transformation $U$ acting on the Hilbert space $\mathcal H$ in some representation. This always induces a unique representation of $U$ on the operator space of endomorphisms $\mathrm{End}(\mathcal H) = \mathcal H^\ast \otimes \mathcal H$ by some general rules so that (*) holds. If $U$ acts in the fundamental representation $\psi' = U\psi$ on $\mathcal H$ then the induced representation $H' = UHU^\dagger$ is called the adjoint representation.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.