0
$\begingroup$

Maxwell's electromagnetic field tensor, $F^{ab}$, is completely antisymmetric rank-2 covariant tensor. The Lorentz transformation can be written as $\Lambda^a_b$, a rank-2 mixed tensor, a.k.a. a transformation matrix. It is not sufficient, however, to use matrix multiplication of the Lorentz matrix with an adjusted Maxwell tensor $F^{ab}g_{bc} = F^a_c$ to find the components of the boosted Maxwell Tensor.

Why is this? In Euclidean space, shouldn't co- and contravariance be interchangeable? Is it because of the nature of the Lorentz matrix, or because of the nature of the Maxwell tensor?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The misconception is that everything has to transform by a single matrix multiplication.

The field tensor is a rank two tensor, so it takes two (co)vectors as arguments. The components of the tensor are found by passing in basis vectors, e.g. $$F^{\mu\nu} = F(e^\mu, e^\nu).$$ Under a Lorentz transformation, both of these input vectors change, so the components change with two factors of the transformation matrix $\Lambda$. In particular, if the coefficients $F^{\mu\nu}$ are put into a matrix $\bar{F}$, the transformation is $$\bar{F} \to \Lambda^T \bar{F} \Lambda.$$ This has nothing to do with the 'nature of the Lorentz matrix' or 'nature of the Maxwell tensor', this is just the generic transformation law for rank 2 tensors.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.