0
$\begingroup$

I would like to know why evanescent waves are not possible in pure vacuum?

Indeed, we have $$ k^2 = \left(\frac{\omega}{c}\right)^2 $$

in vacuum, so we could have for example : $$ k_x^2+k_y^2+k_z^2=\left(\frac{\omega}{c}\right)^2 $$

with $ k_z=i k_z'' $ and $ k_x^2+k_y^2 > \left(\frac{ \omega } {c}\right)^2$.

I have read that we need local charges to do it but I don't understand why.

$\endgroup$
2

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Evanescent waves appear as boundary conditions; vacuum solutions lack boundaries, except at infinity.

S < https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evanescent_field>

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I understand that if I have two medium with n1>n2 it is possible to create a wavector along the x axis in medium 1 that will be larger than the allowed wave vector in the medium 2. So the kz will for example be imaginary in the second medium => evanescent wave. But here, it explains that If I am at the interface between two dielectric I can have evanescent wave in the second if I properly choose my angles. But it doesn't explain why in vacuum it can't happen also. If we don't add any condition on $ k^2=(\frac{w}{c})^2$ in the vacuum nothing forbid to have evanescent wave in vacuum. $\endgroup$
    – StarBucK
    Commented Feb 20, 2016 at 12:48
  • $\begingroup$ When you work the problem you will find that either the evanescent field will vanish, or it will be a transient. Evanescent fields are very important in some applications, such as fiber optics. Working a few problems is always worthwhile. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 20, 2016 at 12:57
0
$\begingroup$

When we study diffraction in optics, we use the angular spectrum of plane waves and indeed, the evanescent waves in a vacuum are components of this spectrum when the sum of the squares of the direction cosines is greater than 1. This is treated in Goodman's book about Fourier optics. Doing a quick search, I found the following link: Angular Spectrum Method

Hope it can help.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.