1
$\begingroup$

How to find a coordinate system whose geodesic equation does not have the "Christoffel symbol" term? (i.e. free particle - generalized Newton's second law.)

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/91348/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Nov 29, 2015 at 21:22
  • $\begingroup$ Can you add more details? You can't always choose a coordinate system where the geodesic equation is trivial everywhere. $\endgroup$
    – user12029
    Commented Nov 29, 2015 at 21:30

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Suppose you're in a coordinate system where the Christoffels don't vanish at some point.

To choose a coordinate system where the Christoffel symbols vanish at a given point $p$, you must apply a Christoffel symbol change of variables:

$$0={\bar\Gamma}^k{}_{ij} = \frac{\partial x^p}{\partial y^i}\, \frac{\partial x^q}{\partial y^j}\, \Gamma^r{}_{pq}\, \frac{\partial y^k}{\partial x^r} + \frac{\partial y^k}{\partial x^m}\, \frac{\partial^2 x^m}{\partial y^i \partial y^j}$$

For simplicity, maybe $\frac{\partial x^a}{\partial y^b}=\delta^a_b$ (evaluated at point $p$ and point p only, so this says nothing about the second derivatives), in which case the equation becomes:

$$0= \Gamma^k_{ij} + \frac{\partial^2 x^k}{\partial y^i \partial y^j}$$

if $x^k=y^k+C^k_{i j} y^i y^j$ and $p$ is the origin, this tells you immediately that if you choose $C^k_{ij}=-\Gamma^k_{ij}$ then you're in a frame where all of the Christoffels vanish.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ It is possible to improve this result, obtaining $\Gamma_{ij}^k=0$ all along a timelike geodesic in a suitable coordinate system defined in a open tube centered on the geodesic. This is a better mathematical description of the equivalence principle than the coordinate system in the answer (mentioned in Landau-Lifsits' textbook). This is because here the "gravitational field" is (approximately) cancelled in a free falling coordinate system (the one constructed in the mentioned tube around the timelike geodesic) and not only around a fixed event. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 30, 2015 at 8:52
  • $\begingroup$ @ValterMoretti Are you referring to Fermi coordinates? $\endgroup$
    – Ryan Unger
    Commented Dec 1, 2015 at 1:46
  • $\begingroup$ I do not think so, I as far as I remember Fermi coordinates also include the notion of non-rotating frame, here unnecessary. I simply referred to so-called normal (or Gaussian) coordinates adapted to a submanifold, the graph of the geodesic in this case. The construction is elementary, it can be found, e.g. in O'Neill's textbook... $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 1, 2015 at 6:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.