0
$\begingroup$

I was just thinking about De Broglie's matter wave equation: $\lambda=\frac{h}{p}$ where $p$ is the momentum of the object. But what if the object is at rest? Won't we be dividing by zero? What if we take the limit as momentum tends to zero, won't we start to get noticeable waves? Can someone please explain to me where I went wrong?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Strictly speaking, you must use the relativistic "momentum". For most objects, it's not simply $mv$. Rather,

$$ \lambda=h/p=hc/pc=hc/\sqrt(T^2+2Tmc^2) $$ For an electron, say, even at quite low energy (e.g. 1 eV) the term $ 2Tmc^2 $ is quite high, and so the wavelength still ends up being quite low (~ angstrom scale). In this limit of $T^2 << 2Tmc^2$, $\lambda \approx h/p$. But it's true, slower moving particles will have longer wavelengths, and those wavelengths can become observable if you have precise enough control of your system and those speeds.

This is also relatable to the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle. If you knew that $p = 0$ very precisely, for $\Delta x \Delta p \ge \hbar / 2$ we'd need larger and larger uncertainties in x to compensate. This would correspond to the particles wavelength becoming larger. In the limit toward $\Delta p = 0$ (which is unphysical) the wavelength of and uncertainty of the particle's position would have to become infinite to compensate.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Alright, thanks mate, I knew I must have gone wrong somewhere... $\endgroup$
    – alexan123
    Commented Aug 31, 2015 at 7:44
  • $\begingroup$ Added a couple comments to clarify that $\lambda = h/p$ is the correct approximation for slow-moving objects. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ How did you do that last step? Are you taking high p or low p? (the question is about low p, so relativity shouldn't matter at all.) $\endgroup$
    – knzhou
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 18:20
  • $\begingroup$ I'm assuming $mc^2 >> T$. I agree that the relativistic correction is small, which is why I specified that only "strictly speaking" you had to use relativistic momentum, and that for small momentum and high mass the approximation works. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 5, 2015 at 22:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.