Timeline for In equation (20) from lecture 10 in Leonard Susskind’s ‘Classical Mechanics’, why is there a summation involved?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21 at 11:36 | answer | added | Marvyn Hsu | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 21 at 9:45 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jul 21 at 9:39 | answer | added | Qmechanic♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 21 at 7:55 | comment | added | mike stone | In four dimensions you need a four-index Levi-Civita symbol $\epsilon_{ijkl}$. | |
| Jul 21 at 7:54 | history | edited | mike stone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed Poisson Brackets.
|
| Jul 21 at 7:51 | comment | added | naturallyInconsistent | The notation makes it clear that it is only applicable to 3D. There is definitely a generalisation to higher dimensions, but it is not obvious how to do it | |
| Jul 21 at 7:46 | history | asked | Bradley Peacock | CC BY-SA 4.0 |