Timeline for Quantum entanglement from different frames of reference and the conservation laws
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29 at 12:00 | comment | added | Tobias Fünke | See the papers by Peres, Peres and Terno about quantum information in relativistic quantum mechanics and classical interventions. Your question is somewhat ill-defined to me, because it seems to rely on "wave function collapse", whose ontological status is not clear (same for wavefunction). Anyways, experimentally, there are two measurements, QM predicts their correlation; that's basically it. I don't understand what you say about conservation laws at all. All observers agree on the measurement outcomes! In the typical EPR-B set-up, this means everyone agrees that the total $S_z=0$ measured. | |
| May 29 at 9:55 | answer | added | alanf | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 29 at 6:39 | history | edited | Rekkhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| May 28 at 8:51 | history | reopened |
alanf Vincent Thacker John Rennie |
||
| May 28 at 8:28 | comment | added | alanf | Relevant answers to similar questions physics.stackexchange.com/questions/622155/… physics.stackexchange.com/questions/255175/… | |
| S May 28 at 8:13 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| May 28 at 8:51 | |||||
| S May 28 at 8:13 | history | edited | Rekkhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
make the question clearer with an example.
Added to review
|
| May 28 at 7:52 | comment | added | Rekkhan | @VincentThacker even if we define that the wave function is just a mathematical description, the reduction of the state occurs at two "points" in space and thus can be considered as two events. | |
| May 28 at 6:20 | history | closed |
WillO Matt Hanson Miyase |
Needs details or clarity | |
| May 27 at 18:28 | comment | added | Vincent Thacker | In entanglement the wavefunction is a function of both positions. The state is entangled precisely because it cannot be separated into two individual ones. The wavefunction is not a physical object in spacetime. It is a function of both position vectors. It represents and encodes the observer's knowledge, i.e. what reality is to the observer. | |
| May 27 at 17:56 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 28 at 6:20 | |||||
| May 26 at 5:04 | comment | added | WillO | What do "the wave function of a particle in entanglement" and "the other particle's wave function" mean? | |
| May 26 at 3:26 | history | edited | Rekkhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 44 characters in body
|
| May 26 at 1:24 | history | edited | Rekkhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
make the question clearer
|
| May 25 at 21:04 | comment | added | Emilio Pisanty | It's important to note that the comment above does not represent a consensus view within the research community on quantum interpretations. | |
| S May 25 at 20:46 | history | suggested | DrChinese |
Add QM tag
|
|
| May 25 at 20:01 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 25 at 20:46 | |||||
| May 25 at 19:51 | answer | added | DrChinese | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 25 at 16:52 | comment | added | Bill Alsept | Observation has nothing to do with it and wavefunctions/entanglement is only mathematical. It has nothing to do with what's physically happening in real time. | |
| May 25 at 16:06 | history | asked | Rekkhan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |