If the total mass of the universe is smaller than estimated by neglecting the gravitational pull of dark matter, the estimated expansion rate should be greater.

Does this consideration in the CMB estimation of the Hubble constant agree with local distance ladder measurements?

If the total mass of the universe is smaller than estimated by neglecting the gravitational pull of dark matter, the estimated expansion rate should be greater.

Does this consideration in the CMB estimation of the Hubble constant agree with local distance ladder measurements?

Edit: I want to discard the energy density of dark matter so that the energy density of matter is only baryonic in the estimation of the Hubble constant.