Timeline for What is the actual significance of the amplituhedron?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2018 at 15:37 | comment | added | MaiaVictor | @giuliobullsaver what you describe is very exciting! Thank you so much for sharing this! | |
| Mar 13, 2018 at 12:28 | comment | added | giulio bullsaver | "A new amplituhedron has been discovered." arxiv.org/abs/1711.09102 We can now compute amplitudes of a scalar, cubic, planar field theory exactly with the same method as was done for N=4 SYM with the original amplituhedron. The new object was already known to mathematicians and string theorists and it's called "Associahedron". Luckily, it is in many regards a much easier object to understand and visualise than the original Amplituhedron. Moreover, this approach produce new formula for amplitudes and seems to give an explanation of the color-kinematic duality. | |
| S Oct 16, 2014 at 17:22 | history | suggested | RandomDSdevel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved this question's grammar, punctuation, and word usage.
|
| Oct 16, 2014 at 17:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 16, 2014 at 17:22 | |||||
| Jan 4, 2014 at 22:08 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Nima's talk @ SUSY2013 on Youtube. | |
| Nov 8, 2013 at 0:50 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
| Sep 27, 2013 at 23:16 | comment | added | Emilio Pisanty | Related: What is the amplituhedron? and The amplituhedron minus the physics at MathOverflow. | |
| Sep 24, 2013 at 14:50 | comment | added | Qmechanic♦ | Amplituhedron on Phys.SE, Mathoverflow, and Wikipedia. | |
| Sep 21, 2013 at 7:04 | history | edited | Philip Gibbs - inactive |
new tag
|
|
| Sep 19, 2013 at 16:27 | history | edited | anna v | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling
|
| Sep 19, 2013 at 15:46 | comment | added | anna v | For a readable description try simonsfoundation.org/quanta/… | |
| Sep 19, 2013 at 6:26 | answer | added | neither space nor information | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 18, 2013 at 21:41 | answer | added | Bavarian Peaberry | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 18, 2013 at 18:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/380394942948208640 | ||
| Sep 18, 2013 at 17:48 | answer | added | Philip Gibbs - inactive | timeline score: 73 | |
| Sep 18, 2013 at 13:18 | answer | added | Scott Bowden | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 18, 2013 at 9:10 | answer | added | Luboš Motl | timeline score: 27 | |
| Sep 18, 2013 at 6:08 | comment | added | Vibert | @dj_mummy: hep-th/1212.5605 is the latest (comprehensive) paper put out by the people working on these Grassmannian methods. I've seen a talk where Arkani-Hamed claimed to have made some progress since then but it's not published yet. | |
| Sep 18, 2013 at 5:40 | history | asked | MaiaVictor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |