Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 11, 2013 at 13:06 review Reopen votes
Sep 11, 2013 at 16:35
Aug 27, 2013 at 5:30 vote accept richard
Aug 27, 2013 at 1:14 comment added Luboš Motl Thanks, Ben, for having pointed out the previous question. Both answers to that older question, not just yours, are just plain wrong. There doesn't exist any complication of the sort that would obscure the boson/fermion identity of a particle, whether it's elementary or composite. The signs added under exchange are always defined for a particle with a finite angular momentum and they're always tightly linked to the integrality/half-integrality of the angular momentum. This behavior is never obscured; only your answers are obscuring a very clear issue. See my answer over there.
Aug 26, 2013 at 20:25 comment added user4552 @LubošMotl: I think this is somewhat of an oversimplification, for the reasons explained in my answer to the question that this one duplicates.
Aug 26, 2013 at 20:01 history closed user4552
Emilio Pisanty
Qmechanic
Duplicate of Huge confusion with Fermions and Bosons and how they relate to total spin of atom
Aug 26, 2013 at 19:48 review Close votes
Aug 26, 2013 at 20:01
Aug 26, 2013 at 19:32 comment added user4552 possible duplicate of Huge confusion with Fermions and Bosons and how they relate to total spin of atom
Aug 26, 2013 at 18:37 comment added Luboš Motl For a true atom, which is electrically neutral, it's the number of neutrons. Even number of neutrons means bosons, odd means fermions. The proton-electron pairs "cancel" and behave like bosons.
Aug 26, 2013 at 18:22 history edited Řídící CC BY-SA 3.0
mhchem
Aug 26, 2013 at 17:59 answer added Johannes timeline score: 8
Aug 26, 2013 at 17:48 history edited Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
edited tags
Aug 26, 2013 at 17:43 history edited John Rennie CC BY-SA 3.0
Minor spelling correction and formatting
Aug 26, 2013 at 17:40 history asked richard CC BY-SA 3.0