Timeline for Why can $\rm CO_2$ significantly displace $\rm O_2$ when both are nearly ideal at ambient?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 16, 2023 at 16:19 | answer | added | Chemomechanics | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 16, 2023 at 2:59 | answer | added | J. Murray | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 16, 2023 at 1:28 | answer | added | Penguino | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 16, 2023 at 0:03 | comment | added | Bohan Xu | @DavidWhite oh, I know CO2 is denser. I agree the Boltzmann distributions of CO2 is more affected by gravity, but it still should be uncorrelated with the Boltzmann distribution of O2, since both are ideal and the "repulsive volume", so to speak, they occupy should be negligibly small. | |
Feb 15, 2023 at 23:58 | comment | added | David White | You only have one molecular species in the cup. | |
Feb 15, 2023 at 23:55 | comment | added | Bohan Xu | @DavidWhite for a single species, I agree. For two species, I don't know what's the conventional definition of molar mass. Also, I don't see how that's relevant, no offense. | |
Feb 15, 2023 at 23:53 | answer | added | Thomas Fritsch | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 15, 2023 at 23:49 | comment | added | David White | Ideal gas density is directly proportional to molar mass. | |
Feb 15, 2023 at 23:35 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 35 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Feb 15, 2023 at 23:31 | history | asked | Bohan Xu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |