Timeline for What is the physical significance of $\mathbf{E}^2-\mathbf{B}^2$ in E and M?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27 at 14:01 | history | reopened |
Chris John Rennie Thomas Fritsch |
||
| Jan 26 at 23:35 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jan 27 at 14:01 | |||||
| Jan 26 at 23:29 | history | closed |
hft Jon Custer Miyase |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Jan 25 at 21:21 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 26 at 23:29 | |||||
| Jan 25 at 20:56 | comment | added | hft | "What is the physical significance..." It is the electromagnetic field lagrange density: physics.stackexchange.com/q/34241 | |
| Jan 25 at 20:47 | answer | added | clark Jeffries | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 16, 2023 at 17:59 | comment | added | Chris | @JerroldFranklin Maybe? Idk I'm not good at physics | |
| Feb 16, 2023 at 17:58 | vote | accept | Chris | ||
| Feb 16, 2023 at 17:58 | comment | added | Jerrold Franklin | Isn't a Lagrangian physical enough? | |
| Feb 10, 2023 at 17:04 | comment | added | J. Murray | I'm not really convinced that "electric minus magnetic" has any less physical meaning than "kinetic minus potential" - can you expand on why you find the latter physically meaningful, but not the former? | |
| Feb 10, 2023 at 3:21 | answer | added | hyportnex | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 9, 2023 at 21:00 | answer | added | Ján Lalinský | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 9, 2023 at 20:28 | answer | added | J.G. | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 9, 2023 at 19:51 | history | edited | Buzz♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2023 at 19:38 | history | asked | Chris | CC BY-SA 4.0 |