Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k
Post Reopened by ZeroTheHero, Cosmas Zachos, DanielC
added 226 characters in body; edited title
Source Link

In Everettian quantum mechanics, what does branching look like if the universe evolvesis in a non-unitarily evolving mixed state?

In Cuffaro and Hartmann's (2021) Open Systems View, the authors suggest, "The problem is that if the physical universe is not represented as a unitarily evolving state vector, then it becomes difficult to conceive of it in terms of a multiverse of effectively independently evolving worlds."

Why is this the case? Can we not get branching if the universe is in a mixed state, and evolves non-unitarily evolving mixed state represented by a density operator?

For those sceptical of non-unitary evolution in EQM, both Wallace (Emergent Multiverse 2012 §10.5) and Carroll (Reality as a Vector in Hilbert Space 2021) consider this to be a possibility.

In Everettian quantum mechanics, what does branching look like if the universe evolves non-unitarily?

In Cuffaro and Hartmann's (2021) Open Systems View, the authors suggest, "The problem is that if the physical universe is not represented as a unitarily evolving state vector, then it becomes difficult to conceive of it in terms of a multiverse of effectively independently evolving worlds."

Why is this the case? Can we not get branching if the universe is in a mixed state, and evolves non-unitarily?

In Everettian quantum mechanics, what does branching look like if the universe is in a non-unitarily evolving mixed state?

In Cuffaro and Hartmann's (2021) Open Systems View, the authors suggest, "The problem is that if the physical universe is not represented as a unitarily evolving state vector, then it becomes difficult to conceive of it in terms of a multiverse of effectively independently evolving worlds."

Why is this the case? Can we not get branching if the universe is in a non-unitarily evolving mixed state represented by a density operator?

For those sceptical of non-unitary evolution in EQM, both Wallace (Emergent Multiverse 2012 §10.5) and Carroll (Reality as a Vector in Hilbert Space 2021) consider this to be a possibility.

added 278 characters in body
Added to review
Source Link

In Everettian quantum mechanicsCuffaro and Hartmann's (2021) Open Systems View, the authors suggest, "The problem is that if the universalphysical universe is not represented as a unitarily evolving state evolves non-unitarilyvector, how doesthen it becomes difficult to conceive of it in terms of a multiverse of effectively independently evolving worlds."

Why is this affect the structure ofcase? Can we not get branching if the universe is in a mixed state, and evolves non-unitarily?

In Everettian quantum mechanics, if the universal state evolves non-unitarily, how does this affect the structure of branching?

In Cuffaro and Hartmann's (2021) Open Systems View, the authors suggest, "The problem is that if the physical universe is not represented as a unitarily evolving state vector, then it becomes difficult to conceive of it in terms of a multiverse of effectively independently evolving worlds."

Why is this the case? Can we not get branching if the universe is in a mixed state, and evolves non-unitarily?

Post Closed as "Needs details or clarity" by ACuriousMind
Source Link
Loading