Skip to main content
Physics

Return to Question

Became Hot Network Question
Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1545966379265818624
added 15 characters in body
Source Link
Ruslan
Ruslan
  • 29.6k
  • 8
  • 69
  • 151

I don't understand why some people argue that Bohmian quantum mechanics is just an interpretation of quantum mechanics. In addition to the usual SchrodingerSchrödinger equation, we have the following deterministic equation (in 1d): $$ m\dot q=\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t)). $$ and$$ m\dot q=\hbar\nabla_q \Im (\ln\psi(q,t)). $$

And we have more information than standard quantum mechanics. If we solve Schrodingerthe Schrödinger equation, the pathpaths of particles are known.

The above equation has not an intrinsic importance in quantum mechanics and we may crudely write the current as $J\sim m\dot q$ which is equal to $\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t))$$\hbar\nabla_q \Im (\ln\psi(q,t))$.

I don't understand why some people argue that Bohmian quantum mechanics is just an interpretation of quantum mechanics. In addition to usual Schrodinger equation, we have the following deterministic equation (in 1d): $$ m\dot q=\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t)). $$ and we have more information than standard quantum mechanics. If we solve Schrodinger equation, the path of particles are known.

The above equation has not an intrinsic importance in quantum mechanics and we may crudely write current as $J\sim m\dot q$ which is equal to $\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t))$.

I don't understand why some people argue that Bohmian quantum mechanics is just an interpretation of quantum mechanics. In addition to the usual Schrödinger equation, we have the following deterministic equation (in 1d): $$ m\dot q=\hbar\nabla_q \Im (\ln\psi(q,t)). $$

And we have more information than standard quantum mechanics. If we solve the Schrödinger equation, the paths of particles are known.

The above equation has not an intrinsic importance in quantum mechanics and we may crudely write the current as $J\sim m\dot q$ which is equal to $\hbar\nabla_q \Im (\ln\psi(q,t))$.

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
reza-ebadi
reza-ebadi
  • 85
  • 3

I don't understand why some people argue that Bohmian quantum mechanics is just an interpretation of quantum mechanics. In addition to usual Schrodinger equation, we have the following deterministic equation in(in 1d): $$ m\dot q=\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t)). $$ and we have more information than standard quantum mechanics. If we solve Schrodinger equation, the path of particles are known.

The above equation has not an intrinsic importance in quantum mechanics and we may crudely write current as $J=m\dot q$$J\sim m\dot q$ which is equal to $\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t))$.

I don't understand why some people argue that Bohmian quantum mechanics is just an interpretation of quantum mechanics. In addition to usual Schrodinger equation, we have the following deterministic equation in 1d: $$ m\dot q=\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t)). $$ and we have more information than standard quantum mechanics. If we solve Schrodinger equation, the path of particles are known.

The above equation has not an intrinsic importance in quantum mechanics and we may crudely write current as $J=m\dot q$ which is equal to $\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t))$.

I don't understand why some people argue that Bohmian quantum mechanics is just an interpretation of quantum mechanics. In addition to usual Schrodinger equation, we have the following deterministic equation (in 1d): $$ m\dot q=\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t)). $$ and we have more information than standard quantum mechanics. If we solve Schrodinger equation, the path of particles are known.

The above equation has not an intrinsic importance in quantum mechanics and we may crudely write current as $J\sim m\dot q$ which is equal to $\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t))$.

Source Link
reza-ebadi
reza-ebadi
  • 85
  • 3

Is Bohmian mechanics an interpretation of quantum mechanics?

I don't understand why some people argue that Bohmian quantum mechanics is just an interpretation of quantum mechanics. In addition to usual Schrodinger equation, we have the following deterministic equation in 1d: $$ m\dot q=\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t)). $$ and we have more information than standard quantum mechanics. If we solve Schrodinger equation, the path of particles are known.

The above equation has not an intrinsic importance in quantum mechanics and we may crudely write current as $J=m\dot q$ which is equal to $\hbar\nabla_q Im (ln\psi(q,t))$.