Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 3, 2020 at 19:05 history edited Ali CC BY-SA 4.0
added 380 characters in body
Nov 2, 2020 at 11:25 comment added ProfRob @Ali Well they are not. The cores of the gas giant planets have a high degree of degeneracy and are not governed by $PV =nRT$. Further (non-wikipedia) reading can be found at arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0502068.pdf
Nov 2, 2020 at 9:14 comment added Ali @RobJeffries You are right in the fact that electron degeneracy pressure is what ultimately keeps the core of a gas giant from collapsing. However I still think that gas giants in our solar system are too young for this to become the dominant effect.
Nov 1, 2020 at 21:13 comment added ProfRob No mention of degeneracy pressure?
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
May 16, 2014 at 20:57 vote accept aserwin
May 7, 2014 at 17:46 comment added Ali @dmckee Thanks. I agree, That's another approach(and maybe even cleaner). I might add later.
May 7, 2014 at 3:03 comment added dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten This is a good answer. It would be even better if it mentioned the Virial theorem.
Aug 3, 2013 at 5:35 comment added Ali @WetSavannaAnimalakaRodVance That is a well known number. I think the Wikipedia page of Jupiter mentions it as well. I think it is dominated(even calculated) by heat loss.
Aug 3, 2013 at 2:29 comment added Selene Routley Could you give a reference for the 2cm a year shrinking? Do you know whether this rate is dominated by heat loss, or by the shrinking arising from space debris falling into Jupiter?
Jul 18, 2013 at 11:42 history edited Emilio Pisanty CC BY-SA 3.0
English corrections.
Jul 18, 2013 at 9:57 history edited Warrick CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed the units in the LaTeX snippets
Jul 18, 2013 at 6:49 history answered Ali CC BY-SA 3.0