Timeline for Why does wet skin offer less resistance?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2016 at 14:56 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 10, 2016 at 14:55 | history | protected | Qmechanic♦ | ||
| Jan 10, 2016 at 14:12 | answer | added | bandybabboon | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 1, 2013 at 5:40 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jun 28, 2013 at 7:42 | answer | added | Voitcus | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 11, 2013 at 4:25 | comment | added | Will | I'm not sure how that is an answer to my question. | |
| Jun 10, 2013 at 5:35 | comment | added | user24082 | Even if it's just two wet patches that are isolated, can't it kill you? | |
| Jun 9, 2013 at 23:57 | comment | added | Will | How are you testing this? Are the two wires touching the same patch of wet skin? If so the current will take the path of least resistance which is the water on the surface of the skin. | |
| Jun 9, 2013 at 23:41 | history | asked | user24082 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |