Timeline for Why are some Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix elements equal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2021 at 16:49 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Tried to make title question more precise
|
| Apr 9, 2021 at 12:58 | vote | accept | Alex Gower | ||
| Apr 9, 2021 at 3:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1380354874450268161 | ||
| Apr 9, 2021 at 0:13 | answer | added | Qmechanic♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 7, 2021 at 21:14 | comment | added | Cosmas Zachos | The devil is in the details. When you use detailed numbers, you see the interesting parameters entering, and invalidating your "leading Wolfenstein picture". If you were asking "why is the Wolfenstein parameterization a good one?", nobody knows. The PMNS matrix for leptons lacks anything similar. | |
| Apr 7, 2021 at 19:54 | comment | added | Cosmas Zachos | How did your instructor explain the Wolfenstein parameterization, eqn (12.4) , (12.5) to you? The structure you confirm is only approximate. | |
| Apr 7, 2021 at 19:45 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 7, 2021 at 19:45 | history | edited | Alex Gower | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 7, 2021 at 19:43 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body; edited tags
|
| Apr 7, 2021 at 19:11 | history | edited | Valter Moretti | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body; edited title
|
| Apr 7, 2021 at 18:32 | history | edited | Alex Gower | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 123 characters in body
|
| Apr 7, 2021 at 18:23 | history | asked | Alex Gower | CC BY-SA 4.0 |