Timeline for Symmetry breaking for 4 scalar fields
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2021 at 10:39 | comment | added | AlmostClueless | If it is interesting or not might be subjective :) , but yes no mixing terms results in no interactions. | |
| Jan 7, 2021 at 10:37 | comment | added | Ream | Yeah, that's it - I suppose lagrangian without fields mixed in the first place wouldn't be really interesting, as there would be no interaction between them, right? | |
| Jan 7, 2021 at 10:36 | vote | accept | Ream | ||
| Jan 6, 2021 at 23:46 | answer | added | Cosmas Zachos | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 6, 2021 at 23:35 | comment | added | AlmostClueless | Your confusion is probably caused by the implicit summation over the index $i$. The last term $-1/4 \lambda(\Sigma_i \phi_i \phi_i)^2$ is mixing the fields. | |
| Jan 6, 2021 at 23:30 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Jan 6, 2021 at 23:05 | history | edited | Ream |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 6, 2021 at 22:53 | comment | added | AlmostClueless | For the first "why" in your question this might be useful: physics.stackexchange.com/q/605486 | |
| Jan 6, 2021 at 22:48 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 7, 2021 at 4:58 | |||||
| Jan 6, 2021 at 22:47 | history | asked | Ream | CC BY-SA 4.0 |