Return to Answer

I guess it will then both translate and rotate:

$$F = m \ddot{x}$$

in the horixontal direction and

$$Fr = I \ddot{\phi}$$

about the CM.

Or, by statics, the equivalent system of forces about the CM is $F$ pointing toward it and a torque with value $Fr$.

I guess it will then both translate and rotate:

$$F = m \ddot{x}$$

in the horizontal direction and

$$Fr = I \ddot{\phi}$$

about the CM.

Or, by statics, the equivalent system of forces about the CM is $F$ pointing toward it and a torque with value $Fr$.

I guess it will then both translate and rotate:

$$F = m \ddot{x}$$

in the horixontal direction and

$$Fr = I \ddot{\phi}$$

about the CM.

Or, by statics, the equivalent system of forces about the CG is $F$ pointing toward it and a torque with value $Fr$.

I guess it will then both translate and rotate:

$$F = m \ddot{x}$$

in the horixontal direction and

$$Fr = I \ddot{\phi}$$

about the CM.

Or, by statics, the equivalent system of forces about the CM is $F$ pointing toward it and a torque with value $Fr$.

I guess it will then both translate and rotate:

$$F = m \ddot{x}$$

in the horixontal direction and

$$Fr = I \ddot{\phi}$$

about the CG.

Or, by statics, the equivalent system of forces about the CG is $F$ pointing toward it and a torque with value $Fr$.

I guess it will then both translate and rotate:

$$F = m \ddot{x}$$

in the horixontal direction and

$$Fr = I \ddot{\phi}$$

about the CM.

Or, by statics, the equivalent system of forces about the CG is $F$ pointing toward it and a torque with value $Fr$.