Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Duplicate" by CommunityBot
edited body
Source Link
Dale
  • 109.1k
  • 11
  • 160
  • 319

So in my QFT course, my professor said that you can set $c$ and $h$ bar$\hbar$ to 1. And he gave us an example:

$$E = mc^{2}$$

And then set $c = 1$:

$$E = m$$

This seems completely ludicrous to me to do. Doesn't it change the result? Why can this be done and why isn't it wrong?

I mean, $E = mc^{2}$ gives you one answer and $E = m$ gives you another, completely different answer!

So in my QFT course, my professor said that you can set $c$ and $h$ bar to 1. And he gave us an example:

$$E = mc^{2}$$

And then set $c = 1$:

$$E = m$$

This seems completely ludicrous to me to do. Doesn't it change the result? Why can this be done and why isn't it wrong?

I mean, $E = mc^{2}$ gives you one answer and $E = m$ gives you another, completely different answer!

So in my QFT course, my professor said that you can set $c$ and $\hbar$ to 1. And he gave us an example:

$$E = mc^{2}$$

And then set $c = 1$:

$$E = m$$

This seems completely ludicrous to me to do. Doesn't it change the result? Why can this be done and why isn't it wrong?

I mean, $E = mc^{2}$ gives you one answer and $E = m$ gives you another, completely different answer!

edited tags; edited title; edited tags
Link
Qmechanic
  • 213k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

Why can we set c$c$ and h bar$\hbar$ to 1 when it changes the result?

Source Link
Tachyon
  • 2k
  • 1
  • 13
  • 30

Why can we set c and h bar to 1 when it changes the result?

So in my QFT course, my professor said that you can set $c$ and $h$ bar to 1. And he gave us an example:

$$E = mc^{2}$$

And then set $c = 1$:

$$E = m$$

This seems completely ludicrous to me to do. Doesn't it change the result? Why can this be done and why isn't it wrong?

I mean, $E = mc^{2}$ gives you one answer and $E = m$ gives you another, completely different answer!