Reference:

Chapter 11.3.1 of Freedman and Van Proeyen's Supergravity textbook.

\begin{eqnarray} \notag \delta(a,\lambda) \phi(x) &=& (a^\mu(x) P_\mu -\frac{1}{2}\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x)M_{\mu\nu}) \phi(x) \\\notag &=& (a^\mu(x) \partial_\mu +\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu \partial_\mu) \phi(x)\\\notag &=& (a^\mu(x) +\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu) \partial_\mu \phi(x) \\\notag &=& (\xi^\mu(x)) \partial_\mu \phi(x) \\\notag &=& L_\xi \phi(x) \\ &=& \delta_{gct} \phi(x) \end{eqnarray}

where we generalized the old spacetime translation vector $a^\mu(x)$ to curved spacetime with $\xi^\mu(x)= a^\mu(x)+ \lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu$. So we will have general coordinate transformations (GCTs) parametrized by $\xi^\mu(x)$ and local Lorentz transformations (LLTs) parametrized by $\lambda^{ab}(x)$.

I am trying to understand the introduction of "covariant GCTs" (CGCTs) in the context of gauged spacetime translations. CGCTs are defined by equation 11.61 in the referenced above

\begin{equation} \delta_{cgct} (\xi) = \delta_{gct}(\xi) - \delta(\xi^\mu B_\mu) \end{equation}

This is motivated by the following:

Consider the standard transformation of scalar fields given by equations 11.1 and 11.2 in the reference above

\begin{equation} \delta(\epsilon) \phi^i(x) = - \epsilon^A(x) t_A{}^i{}_j \phi^j \end{equation}

Now, we showed above what the transformation of the scalar field under GCTs is, so lets say that the symmetry ($T_A = - (t_A)^i{}_j$) is GCT, i.e. $\partial_\mu$, and the parameter ($\epsilon$) is $\xi$.

Then we have, as before,

\begin{equation} \delta(\xi) \phi^i(x) = \xi^\mu(x) \partial_\mu \phi^i(x) \end{equation}

The authors then state on page 228,

"This is correct, but it has the undesirable property that it does not transform covariantly under internal symmetry. We fix this by adding a field dependent gauge transformation and thus define

\begin{equation} \delta_{cgct}(\xi) \phi^i = \xi^\mu \partial_\mu \phi^i(x)+(\xi^\mu A_\mu{}^A)t_{A}{}^i{}_j \phi^j" \end{equation}

where $\phi^i$ and $\xi$ are still functions of spacetime, the $(x)$ has just been neglected for brevity.

My confusion lies in "but it has the undesirable property that it does not transform covariantly under internal symmetry."

Can anyone expound on this?

Reference:

Chapter 11.3.1 of Freedman and Van Proeyen's Supergravity textbook.

\begin{eqnarray} \notag \delta(a,\lambda) \phi(x) &=& \left(a^\mu(x) P_\mu -\frac{1}{2}\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x)M_{\mu\nu}\right) \phi(x) \\\notag &=& \left(a^\mu(x) \partial_\mu +\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu \partial_\mu\right) \phi(x)\\\notag &=& \left(a^\mu(x) +\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu\right) \partial_\mu \phi(x) \\\notag &=:& \xi^\mu(x) \partial_\mu \phi(x) \\\notag &=& L_\xi \phi(x) \\ &=:& \delta_{\text{gct}} \phi(x) \end{eqnarray}

where we generalized the old spacetime translation vector $a^\mu(x)$ to curved spacetime with $\xi^\mu(x)= a^\mu(x)+ \lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu$. So we will have general coordinate transformations (GCTs) parametrized by $\xi^\mu(x)$ and local Lorentz transformations (LLTs) parametrized by $\lambda^{ab}(x)$.

I am trying to understand the introduction of "covariant GCTs" (CGCTs) in the context of gauged spacetime translations. CGCTs are defined by equation 11.61 in the reference above

\begin{equation} \delta_{\text{cgct}} (\xi) = \delta_{\text{gct}}(\xi) - \delta(\xi^\mu B_\mu) \end{equation}

This is motivated by the following:

Consider the standard transformation of scalar fields given by equations 11.1 and 11.2 in the reference above

\begin{equation} \delta(\epsilon) \phi^i(x) = - \epsilon^A(x) t_A{}^i{}_j \phi^j \end{equation}

Now, we showed above what the transformation of the scalar field under GCTs is, so let's say that the symmetry ($T_A = - (t_A)^i{}_j$) is GCT, i.e. $\partial_\mu$, and the parameter ($\epsilon$) is $\xi$.

Then we have, as before,

\begin{equation} \delta(\xi) \phi^i(x) = \xi^\mu(x) \partial_\mu \phi^i(x) \end{equation}

The authors then state on page 228,

"This is correct, but it has the undesirable property that it does not transform covariantly under internal symmetry. We fix this by adding a field-dependent gauge transformation and thus define

\begin{equation} \delta_{\text{cgct}}(\xi) \phi^i = \xi^\mu \partial_\mu \phi^i(x)+(\xi^\mu A_\mu{}^A)t_{A}{}^i{}_j \phi^j" \end{equation}

where $\phi^i$ and $\xi$ are still functions of spacetime, the $(x)$ has just been neglected for brevity.

My confusion lies in "but it has the undesirable property that it does not transform covariantly under internal symmetry."

Can anyone expound on this?

Reference:

Chapter 11.3.1 of Freedman and Van Proeyen's Supergravity textbook.

\begin{eqnarray} \notag \delta(a,\lambda) \phi(x) &=& (a^\mu(x) P_\mu -\frac{1}{2}\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x)M_{\mu\nu}) \phi(x) \\\notag &=& (a^\mu(x) \partial_\mu +\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu \partial_\mu) \phi(x)\\\notag &=& (a^\mu(x) +\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu) \partial_\mu \phi(x) \\\notag &=& (\xi^\mu(x)) \partial_\mu \phi(x) \\\notag &=& L_\xi \phi(x) \\ &=& \delta_{gct} \phi(x) \end{eqnarray}

where we generalized the old spacetime translation vector $a^\mu(x)$ to curved spacetime with $\xi^\mu(x)= a^\mu(x)+ \lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu$. So we will have general coordinate transformations (GCTs) parametrized by $\xi^\mu(x)$ and local Lorentz transformations (LLTs) parametrized by $\lambda^{ab}(x)$.

I am trying to understand the introduction of "covariant GCTs" (CGCTs) in the context of gauged spacetime translations. CGCTs are defined by equation 11.61 in the referenced above

\begin{equation} \delta_{cgct} (\xi) = \delta_{gct}(\xi) - \delta(\xi^\mu B_\mu) \end{equation}

This is motivated by the following:

Consider the standard transformation of scalar fields given by equations 11.1 and 11.2 in the reference above

\begin{equation} \delta(\epsilon) \phi^i(x) = - \epsilon^A(x) t_A{}^i{}_j \phi^j \end{equation}

Now, we showed above what the transformation of the scalar field under GCTs is, so lets say that the symmetry ($T_A = - (t_A)^i{}_j$) is GCT, i.e. $\partial_\mu$, and the parameter ($\epsilon$) is $\xi$.

Then we have, as before,

\begin{equation} \delta(\xi) \phi^i(x) = \xi^\mu(x) \partial_\mu \phi^i(x) \end{equation}

The authors then state on page 228,

"This is correct, but it has the undesirable property that it does not transform covariantly under internal symmetry. We fix this by adding a field dependent gauge transformation and thus define

\begin{equation} \delta_{cgct}(\xi) \phi^i = \xi^\mu \partial_\mu \phi^i(x)+(\xi^\mu A_\mu{}^A)t_{A}{}^i{}_j \phi^j" \end{equation}

where $\phi^i$ and $\xi$ are still functions of spacetime, the $(x)$ has just been neglected for brevity.

My confusion lies in "but it has the undesirable property that it does not transform covariantly under internal symmetry."

Can anyone expound on this?

Reference:

Chapter 11.3.1 of Freedman and Van Proeyen's Supergravity textbook.

\begin{eqnarray} \notag \delta(a,\lambda) \phi(x) &=& (a^\mu(x) P_\mu -\frac{1}{2}\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x)M_{\mu\nu}) \phi(x) \\\notag &=& (a^\mu(x) \partial_\mu +\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu \partial_\mu) \phi(x)\\\notag &=& (a^\mu(x) +\lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu) \partial_\mu \phi(x) \\\notag &=& (\xi^\mu(x)) \partial_\mu \phi(x) \\\notag &=& L_\xi \phi(x) \\ &=& \delta_{gct} \phi(x) \end{eqnarray}

where we generalized the old spacetime translation vector $a^\mu(x)$ to curved spacetime with $\xi^\mu(x)= a^\mu(x)+ \lambda^{\mu\nu}(x) x_\nu$. So we will have general coordinate transformations (GCTs) parametrized by $\xi^\mu(x)$ and local Lorentz transformations (LLTs) parametrized by $\lambda^{ab}(x)$.

I am trying to understand the introduction of "covariant GCTs" (CGCTs) in the context of gauged spacetime translations. CGCTs are defined by equation 11.61 in the referenced above

\begin{equation} \delta_{cgct} (\xi) = \delta_{gct}(\xi) - \delta(\xi^\mu B_\mu) \end{equation}

This is motivated by the following:

Consider the standard transformation of scalar fields given by equations 11.1 and 11.2 in the reference above

\begin{equation} \delta(\epsilon) \phi^i(x) = - \epsilon^A(x) t_A{}^i{}_j \phi^j \end{equation}

Now, we showed above what the transformation of the scalar field under GCTs is, so lets say that the symmetry ($T_A = - (t_A)^i{}_j$) is GCT, i.e. $\partial_\mu$, and the parameter ($\epsilon$) is $\xi$.

Then we have, as before,

\begin{equation} \delta(\xi) \phi^i(x) = \xi^\mu(x) \partial_\mu \phi^i(x) \end{equation}

The authors then state on page 228,

"This is correct, but it has the undesirable property that it does not transform covariantly under internal symmetry. We fix this by adding a field dependent gauge transformation and thus define

\begin{equation} \delta_{cgct}(\xi) \phi^i = \xi^\mu \partial_\mu \phi^i(x)+(\xi^\mu A_\mu{}^A)t_{A}{}^i{}_j \phi^j" \end{equation}

where $\phi^i$ and $\xi$ are still functions of spacetime, the $(x)$ has just been neglected for brevity.

My confusion lies in "but it has the undesirable property that it does not transform covariantly under internal symmetry."

Can anyone expound on this?