Skip to main content
Physics

Return to Question

Format and title improvements while this is on the front page.
Source Link
Emilio Pisanty
Emilio Pisanty
  • 135.4k
  • 33
  • 358
  • 677

Quantum Mechanics proved incorrect. Bohr Does this experiment on wave- Einstein debates concludedparticle duality and complementarity disprove quantum mechanics and prove the EPR viewpoint on it?

"Photons act like they go through two paths, even when we know which they took". I recently read

Photons act like they go through two paths, even when we know which they took, at Ars Technica,

which reports on the paper

Wave-particle dualism and complementarity unraveled by a different mode. R. Menzel et al. PNAS 109 (2012), 9314.

Please refer the aboveArs Technica link and its conclusion.

I am an Engineer. What I infer from this is :-

  1. This proves ERP.
  2. Einstein Wins.
  3. This basically proves that quantum mechanics is incomplete/incorrect.
  4. There is a requirement for an extension for QM.

What this does is :

  1. "Declaration of completeness of quantum mechanics" by Heisenberg needs to be pulled down officially
  2. Other theories needs to be thought about, like Bohm's.

Can somebody confirm my understanding ? Any help is appreciated.

Quantum Mechanics proved incorrect. Bohr - Einstein debates concluded?

"Photons act like they go through two paths, even when we know which they took".

Please refer the above link and its conclusion.

I am an Engineer. What I infer from this is :-

  1. This proves ERP.
  2. Einstein Wins.
  3. This basically proves that quantum mechanics is incomplete/incorrect.
  4. There is a requirement for an extension for QM.

What this does is :

  1. "Declaration of completeness of quantum mechanics" by Heisenberg needs to be pulled down officially
  2. Other theories needs to be thought about, like Bohm's.

Can somebody confirm my understanding ? Any help is appreciated.

Does this experiment on wave-particle duality and complementarity disprove quantum mechanics and prove the EPR viewpoint on it?

I recently read

Photons act like they go through two paths, even when we know which they took, at Ars Technica,

which reports on the paper

Wave-particle dualism and complementarity unraveled by a different mode. R. Menzel et al. PNAS 109 (2012), 9314.

Please refer the Ars Technica link and its conclusion.

I am an Engineer. What I infer from this is :-

  1. This proves ERP.
  2. Einstein Wins.
  3. This basically proves that quantum mechanics is incomplete/incorrect.
  4. There is a requirement for an extension for QM.

What this does is :

  1. "Declaration of completeness of quantum mechanics" by Heisenberg needs to be pulled down officially
  2. Other theories needs to be thought about, like Bohm's.

Can somebody confirm my understanding ? Any help is appreciated.

edited tags
Link
Michael
Michael
  • 16.7k
  • 2
  • 50
  • 69
Source Link
user1813004
user1813004
  • 21

Quantum Mechanics proved incorrect. Bohr - Einstein debates concluded?

"Photons act like they go through two paths, even when we know which they took".

Please refer the above link and its conclusion.

I am an Engineer. What I infer from this is :-

  1. This proves ERP.
  2. Einstein Wins.
  3. This basically proves that quantum mechanics is incomplete/incorrect.
  4. There is a requirement for an extension for QM.

What this does is :

  1. "Declaration of completeness of quantum mechanics" by Heisenberg needs to be pulled down officially
  2. Other theories needs to be thought about, like Bohm's.

Can somebody confirm my understanding ? Any help is appreciated.