Skip to main content
Physics

Return to Question

Post Closed as "Duplicate" by Jon Custer, Kyle Kanos, ZeroTheHero, GiorgioP-DoomsdayClockIsAt-90, John Rennie special-relativity
edited tags
Source Link
Qmechanic ♦
Qmechanic ♦
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

Why is this v$v > cc$ example wrong?

Take an acceleration equal to g for 1 year. Isn't the speed of light reached? And exceeded after this time? In the Indian journal Pramana Soviet's scientists made this argument  . They explained we leave the realm of special relativity and it's light speed restriction and enter the realm of general relativity where acceleration is treated.

Why is this v > c example wrong?

Take an acceleration equal to g for 1 year. Isn't the speed of light reached? And exceeded after this time? In the Indian journal Pramana Soviet's scientists made this argument  . They explained we leave the realm of special relativity and it's light speed restriction and enter the realm of general relativity where acceleration is treated.

Why is this $v > c$ example wrong?

Take an acceleration equal to g for 1 year. Isn't the speed of light reached? And exceeded after this time? In the Indian journal Pramana Soviet's scientists made this argument. They explained we leave the realm of special relativity and it's light speed restriction and enter the realm of general relativity where acceleration is treated.

Source Link
Larry
Larry
  • 1
  • 4

Why is this v > c example wrong?

Take an acceleration equal to g for 1 year. Isn't the speed of light reached? And exceeded after this time? In the Indian journal Pramana Soviet's scientists made this argument . They explained we leave the realm of special relativity and it's light speed restriction and enter the realm of general relativity where acceleration is treated.