Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1192411509906952193
Became Hot Network Question
added 426 characters in body
Source Link
Stefan
  • 371
  • 2
  • 8

The Bohr model is incomplete and has drawbacks. But one thing is a mystery to me. Why did it so successfully calculate the rydbergRydberg series with quite good number of correct digits?

Having such a good prediction one would expect that therthere exists an extension or modificaitonmodification to it, although we may not have found it, that would yield the correct model. But today we have abondonabandon it completely and use QED. I would expect that from QED we should be able to derive the math in the Bohr model, my subquestionsub question is if there is such a derivation and it would also be super duper if we could sketch it here.

To reproduce the energy levels is not enough, that's too simple. What bugs my is that Bohr derives the energy from very few assumptions and sets up the solution through a natural force balance. Why is it that a faulty model can deduce the energy levels? My expectation is that the success to use this force balance should be possible to be answered from Shrödinger or Dirac and it is this link I want to know more about.

The Bohr model is incomplete and has drawbacks. But one thing is a mystery to me. Why did it so successfully calculate the rydberg series with quite good number of correct digits?

Having such a good prediction one would expect that ther exists an extension or modificaiton to it, although we may not have found it, that would yield the correct model. But today we have abondon it completely and use QED. I would expect that from QED we should be able to derive the math in the Bohr model, my subquestion is if there is such a derivation and it would also be super duper if we could sketch it here.

The Bohr model is incomplete and has drawbacks. But one thing is a mystery to me. Why did it so successfully calculate the Rydberg series with quite good number of correct digits?

Having such a good prediction one would expect that there exists an extension or modification to it, although we may not have found it, that would yield the correct model. But today we have abandon it completely and use QED. I would expect that from QED we should be able to derive the math in the Bohr model, my sub question is if there is such a derivation and it would also be super duper if we could sketch it here.

To reproduce the energy levels is not enough, that's too simple. What bugs my is that Bohr derives the energy from very few assumptions and sets up the solution through a natural force balance. Why is it that a faulty model can deduce the energy levels? My expectation is that the success to use this force balance should be possible to be answered from Shrödinger or Dirac and it is this link I want to know more about.

Res. req. can usually not be mixed with an actual physics question
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 213.1k
  • 48
  • 590
  • 2.3k

Why did the Bohr Model Successfully calculate some of the energy levels in hydrogenehydrogen?

The Bohr model is incomplete and has drawbacks. But one thing is a mystery to me. Why did it so successfully calculate the rydberg series with quite good number of correct digits?

Having such a good prediction one would expect that ther exists an extension or modificaiton to it, although we may not have found it, that would yield the correct model. But today we have abondon it completely and use QED. I would expect that from QED we should be able to derive the math in the Bohr model, my subquestion is therefore where I can find a link forif there is such a derivation and it would also be super duper if we could sketch it here.

Why did the Bohr Model Successfully calculate some of the energy levels in hydrogene

The Bohr model is incomplete and has drawbacks. But one thing is a mystery to me. Why did it so successfully calculate the rydberg series with quite good number of correct digits?

Having such a good prediction one would expect that ther exists an extension or modificaiton to it, although we may not have found it, that would yield the correct model. But today we have abondon it completely and use QED. I would expect that from QED we should be able to derive the math in the Bohr model, my subquestion is therefore where I can find a link for such a derivation and it would also be super duper if we could sketch it here.

Why did the Bohr Model Successfully calculate some of the energy levels in hydrogen?

The Bohr model is incomplete and has drawbacks. But one thing is a mystery to me. Why did it so successfully calculate the rydberg series with quite good number of correct digits?

Having such a good prediction one would expect that ther exists an extension or modificaiton to it, although we may not have found it, that would yield the correct model. But today we have abondon it completely and use QED. I would expect that from QED we should be able to derive the math in the Bohr model, my subquestion is if there is such a derivation and it would also be super duper if we could sketch it here.

Source Link
Stefan
  • 371
  • 2
  • 8

Why did the Bohr Model Successfully calculate some of the energy levels in hydrogene

The Bohr model is incomplete and has drawbacks. But one thing is a mystery to me. Why did it so successfully calculate the rydberg series with quite good number of correct digits?

Having such a good prediction one would expect that ther exists an extension or modificaiton to it, although we may not have found it, that would yield the correct model. But today we have abondon it completely and use QED. I would expect that from QED we should be able to derive the math in the Bohr model, my subquestion is therefore where I can find a link for such a derivation and it would also be super duper if we could sketch it here.