Timeline for How can one tell they are accelerating?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
35 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2020 at 16:48 | vote | accept | Joshua Pasa | ||
| Apr 8, 2020 at 16:48 | vote | accept | Joshua Pasa | ||
| Apr 8, 2020 at 16:48 | |||||
| Dec 24, 2019 at 19:01 | vote | accept | Joshua Pasa | ||
| Apr 8, 2020 at 16:48 | |||||
| Dec 24, 2019 at 19:01 | vote | accept | Joshua Pasa | ||
| Dec 24, 2019 at 19:01 | |||||
| Oct 30, 2019 at 5:55 | answer | added | tparker | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 29, 2019 at 15:23 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Oct 29, 2019 at 11:50 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
| Oct 29, 2019 at 11:04 | comment | added | BioPhysicist | @DavidHammen I completely agree. But it's not your question, so such drastic edits should not be made by you, even if it does make the question better. | |
| Oct 29, 2019 at 10:50 | comment | added | Joshua Pasa | @DavidHammen Is this edit still too broad? I just want to know if there is a lorentz transform for more complicated motions and if these reference frames obey the laws of physics, if everything acellerated equally. | |
| Oct 29, 2019 at 10:45 | history | edited | Joshua Pasa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 750 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Oct 29, 2019 at 6:16 | comment | added | David Hammen | As is, the question should be closed as "too broad" -- and answering that overly broad question will not help the OP's understanding. Keeping the question to revision 5 makes it a more focused question, and an answer can perhaps help the OP. But since it was the OP who made the question overly broad with revision 6, that leaves the only alternative being downvotes and votes to close. | |
| Oct 29, 2019 at 6:12 | history | rollback | BioPhysicist |
Rollback to Revision 7
|
|
| Oct 29, 2019 at 6:12 | comment | added | BioPhysicist | @DavidHammen That is a good suggestion, but you shouldn't make such edits that go against the intent of the OP (even if you are rolling back to a previous version). Please make your suggestion and let the OP follow accordingly. If the OP does not agree and you think the question is still poor, then a down vote would sufficiently express this sentiment. | |
| Oct 29, 2019 at 4:46 | comment | added | David Hammen | I rolled this back to revision 5. Little steps, hu huu. You need to understand acceleration from the context of Newtonian mechanics and special relativity before you jump into general relativity. | |
| Oct 29, 2019 at 4:41 | history | rollback | David Hammen |
Rollback to Revision 5
|
|
| Oct 28, 2019 at 17:13 | comment | added | m4r35n357 | . . . and you are still looking at this as a relativity problem. Einstein's equations are_not_ going to help you !!!! You need to go back to basics. | |
| Oct 28, 2019 at 16:28 | answer | added | robphy | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Oct 28, 2019 at 14:17 | history | suggested | MarianD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Some fixes.
|
| Oct 28, 2019 at 14:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 28, 2019 at 14:17 | |||||
| Oct 28, 2019 at 13:38 | history | edited | Joshua Pasa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 833 characters in body; edited tags; deleted 11 characters in body
|
| Oct 28, 2019 at 13:30 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 4, 2019 at 3:05 | |||||
| Oct 28, 2019 at 13:12 | comment | added | BioPhysicist | Your new edit makes your question too broad. Please limit your post to one focused question. | |
| Oct 28, 2019 at 13:08 | history | edited | Joshua Pasa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 208 characters in body; edited body
|
| Oct 28, 2019 at 10:06 | comment | added | m4r35n357 | Your question is nothing to do with special relativity, it applies to Newtonian physics also. You need to understand what acceleration is, not relativity! | |
| Oct 28, 2019 at 7:30 | comment | added | safesphere | "How can one tell they are..." - Are they talking to each other while accelerating? | |
| Oct 28, 2019 at 4:09 | answer | added | BioPhysicist | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 28, 2019 at 2:58 | answer | added | Adrian Howard | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 28, 2019 at 2:33 | comment | added | lalala | Actually you are asking about free fall. There every particle gets accelerated, and yes you dont feel it. Only if thr acceleration is not homigrneous leading to tidal forces for example. | |
| Oct 28, 2019 at 1:35 | answer | added | mmesser314 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 27, 2019 at 23:47 | history | edited | Joshua Pasa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2019 at 23:17 | answer | added | David Keith | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 27, 2019 at 23:16 | history | edited | Joshua Pasa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 27, 2019 at 23:07 | comment | added | Dale | You use an accelerometer | |
| Oct 27, 2019 at 23:02 | history | edited | Kyle Kanos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Just one L
|
| Oct 27, 2019 at 22:59 | history | asked | Joshua Pasa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |