Timeline for Is complex conjugation operator Hermitian?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 28, 2019 at 14:55 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
Oct 27, 2019 at 15:44 | comment | added | Emilio Pisanty | "more generally, how do we define Hermiticity for antilinear operators?" $-$ who says that we do? I wouldn't consider using such notation at all, and I would class its usage in any text in the literature as misleading unless the text was extremely clear about what they meant by the notation and how the notion interacts with the usual notion of hermiticity. | |
Oct 27, 2019 at 12:15 | review | Close votes | |||
Oct 28, 2019 at 13:08 | |||||
Oct 27, 2019 at 10:07 | answer | added | Qmechanic♦ | timeline score: 10 | |
Oct 27, 2019 at 5:12 | history | edited | fieryslug | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Oct 27, 2019 at 5:12 | comment | added | fieryslug | The weird thing is that any c-number a+ib is an "eigenstate" of the operator with an eigenvalue (a-ib)/(a+ib), which is not necessarily real. | |
Oct 27, 2019 at 4:46 | comment | added | Alex | Are you sure the eigenvalues are not necessarily real? | |
Oct 27, 2019 at 4:16 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 27, 2019 at 4:10 | history | asked | fieryslug | CC BY-SA 4.0 |