Skip to main content
19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 10 at 17:07 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jul 8 at 10:05 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Feb 27 at 7:07 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Oct 29, 2023 at 19:00 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jun 30, 2023 at 12:06 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Mar 18, 2019 at 18:41 answer added ggs timeline score: 0
Feb 12, 2019 at 14:14 comment added Jon Custer Start with physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.3037792, then go look at Ortec and Canberra product literature for their detectors.
Feb 12, 2019 at 4:03 comment added ggs Sir pl respond.
Feb 9, 2019 at 11:22 comment added ggs Dear Sir, the following questions remains....1. Why n+ contact in n type Ge is not several hundred microns? More depletion layer shall come as per your answer. 2. Why we require both additional p or n type contact? in p type Ge, why we require additional p type junction also? crystal itself should work as p junction. Only n type contact should do the job. 3. Why Be Endcap is not used in p type coaxial Ge detector? We shall get high efficiency at both low and high energy. Pl dont get angry.
Feb 9, 2019 at 11:16 comment added ggs Dear Sir, the following questions remains....
Feb 5, 2019 at 17:43 comment added Jon Custer You seem to believe that I exist to answer your question - that is pretty annoying. Look, I've given you plenty of information above about just how gamma detectors work, why you want a thick, lightly doped region to get maximum performance, and why lithium ends up being the dopant of choice. How much clearer do I need to be?
Feb 5, 2019 at 14:59 comment added ggs Dear Jon Custer pl respond....
Feb 5, 2019 at 8:06 comment added ggs It is not clear why 700um Li contact is required? Is it mandetory requirement or due to technology used for doping?
Feb 4, 2019 at 19:54 comment added Jon Custer Lithium is used in silicon and germanium detectors since its diffusion can be driven by biasing the device. There is no way (within reason) that one could diffuse a more normal dopant (B, P, As) over 100's of microns. But with lithium one can get a nice, even doping profile at fairly low levels across millimeters to centimeters. Now, add a highly doped, ion-implanted p++ contact, and you have a great volumetric sensor. Remember, the goal is to make as wide a depletion layer as you can to increase the active volume.
Feb 4, 2019 at 16:00 comment added ggs So do you mean to say since Li is diffused, the thickness is more? And since implanted, p type thickness is less? Then Q remains, why Li is also not implanted?
Feb 4, 2019 at 15:45 comment added Jon Custer If the p contact is doped much higher than the n side, then the depletion layer will grow much further into the n region. So, if the p is, say, $10^{18}$ and the n is $10^{15}$, then the n side of the depletion layer is 1000 times wider than the p side.
Feb 4, 2019 at 15:31 comment added ggs Why same does not happen for p+ contact of n type Ge?
Feb 4, 2019 at 14:34 comment added Jon Custer Because the n-type region is diffused lithium, and the p-type region is implanted boron. Under reverse bias the depletion region grows dramatically into the n-type region, resulting in a large detection volume.
Feb 4, 2019 at 14:16 history asked ggs CC BY-SA 4.0