Timeline for Chiral anomaly and decay of the pion
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2020 at 1:53 | comment | added | Linas | Yes, but... Jackiw implies that simply using massive quarks (without using the anomaly) is not enough to explain the decay width of the pion, implying you would get an answer a factor of ten too small (if I read that right). So my understanding is that you still need the anomaly to fully obtain the correct decay width. Oh, and bonus points: you only get the right answer with 3 generations of quarks, not four or more. | |
| Feb 4, 2019 at 4:41 | comment | added | rob♦ | Note to reviewers: this answer has been substantially edited. | |
| Feb 4, 2019 at 2:42 | history | undeleted | PietroF | ||
| Feb 4, 2019 at 2:40 | history | edited | PietroF | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 608 characters in body
|
| S Feb 3, 2019 at 2:42 | history | post deleted from review |
Emilio Pisanty Kyle Kanos ZeroTheHero Buzz♦ user191954 Andrew Steane |
||
| Feb 2, 2019 at 18:55 | review | Low quality answers | |||
| S Feb 3, 2019 at 2:42 | |||||
| Feb 2, 2019 at 18:40 | review | Late answers | |||
| Feb 2, 2019 at 18:50 | |||||
| Feb 2, 2019 at 18:25 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 2, 2019 at 19:04 | |||||
| Feb 2, 2019 at 18:23 | history | answered | PietroF | CC BY-SA 4.0 |