Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 11, 2018 at 16:30 comment added Gallifreyan It'd be interesting to see answers addressing the recent videos by ElectroBOOM and a follow-up by Lewin
Nov 9, 2018 at 13:16 comment added Nicolas Well, in the presence of varying electric fields, both the gradient of electric potential (as usual) and the time derivative of magnetic field contribute to pushing electrons. This second term, which cant be accounted for by an electric potential, is described as "electromotive force" over all loops in the circuit.
Nov 9, 2018 at 5:11 comment added Utkarsh Verma @AlfredCentauri This is the first time I'm hearing of limitations of Kirchoff's laws, I gave the link you referred a read, but it didn't help. Could you please explain it to me with respect to the issue here?
Nov 9, 2018 at 5:07 comment added Utkarsh Verma @K_inverse Could you please elaborate it?
Nov 8, 2018 at 15:26 comment added K_inverse @Nicolas Absolutely, but $\phi$ here is not the same as the electrical potential that we used to in magnetostatic case.
Nov 8, 2018 at 14:46 answer added Daniel Turizo timeline score: 3
Nov 8, 2018 at 13:14 comment added Nicolas @K_inverse Actually it can still be defined, and it is related to electric field by $\mathbf E=-\partial_t \mathbf A- \mathbf\nabla \phi$ where $\mathbf A$ is the vector potential
Nov 8, 2018 at 13:01 answer added Emilio Pisanty timeline score: 7
Nov 8, 2018 at 12:42 history edited Emilio Pisanty CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body; edited title
Nov 8, 2018 at 12:40 comment added Alfred Centauri You're aware that Kirchhoff's circuit laws are approximations that hold exactly only in the non-time varying, lumped element limit? See Kirchhoff's circuit laws:Limitations
Nov 8, 2018 at 11:55 comment added K_inverse In fact, when there is changing B field, the usual electrical potential cannot be defined.
Nov 8, 2018 at 11:23 history asked Utkarsh Verma CC BY-SA 4.0