Timeline for Why do we assume the force of static friction is maximum in problems involved with rolling objects on inclined planes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2020 at 15:55 | history | edited | BioPhysicist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Oct 9, 2018 at 13:24 | comment | added | BioPhysicist | I have made more in depth edits to my answer. | |
| Oct 9, 2018 at 12:10 | vote | accept | AgentS | ||
| Oct 9, 2018 at 11:33 | answer | added | BioPhysicist | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 9, 2018 at 10:50 | answer | added | Onepunchass | timeline score: -1 | |
| Oct 9, 2018 at 9:43 | comment | added | npojo | Neither of the two options is correct. Friction force is not the maximum static force and is not equal $mgsin\theta$ (unless $a=0$). Friction force is initially unknown, as well as the acceleration. Assuming rolling without slipping, you can set up two equations to find both variables. | |
| Oct 9, 2018 at 8:32 | history | edited | AgentS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
| Oct 9, 2018 at 8:26 | history | asked | AgentS | CC BY-SA 4.0 |