Timeline for Neutron stars - only neutrons?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2020 at 1:16 | answer | added | Roghan Arun | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 28, 2017 at 1:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/879878191904686080 | ||
| Jun 27, 2017 at 21:59 | comment | added | ProfRob | @dmckee You are quantitatively way off. | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 20:04 | vote | accept | auden | ||
| Jun 27, 2017 at 19:25 | answer | added | ProfRob | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 18:43 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | Yes, mostly neutrons are the key. AFAIK, a NS is so named b/c the process $p+e^-\to n+\nu_e$, which can't happen w/o protons & electrons. | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 17:07 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | As an aside, the museum display may be knowingly simplifying for an unsophisticated audience. The neutrons are roughly 1800 times as numerous as the electrons and protons so why quibble? | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 16:53 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| Jun 27, 2017 at 16:47 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | Closely related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/63383 physics.stackexchange.com/q/9098 and links therein, plus I thought there was a "composition of neutron stars" question, but I haven't yet found it. | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 16:22 | comment | added | Hritik Narayan | Wikipedia is right. I'm very sure. Check this out: physics.stackexchange.com/q/206856 | |
| Jun 27, 2017 at 15:37 | history | asked | auden | CC BY-SA 3.0 |