Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 8, 2020 at 12:06 comment added Milan @YvanVelenik Great, thanks!
Jul 8, 2020 at 7:49 comment added Yvan Velenik @Milan : Well, it was a while ago, so I don't remember. It could be Goldstein's paper in this book. But there are other nice papers addressing this topic by Lebowitz or Bricmont for instance (examples: this one and that one).
Jul 8, 2020 at 1:18 comment added Milan @YvanVelenik What paper were you referencing? The link is dead.
May 5, 2013 at 9:21 history closed Qmechanic exact duplicate
May 5, 2013 at 9:21 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 3.0
paradox tag is not allowed
May 2, 2013 at 15:57 history edited Jim
edited tags
S Aug 14, 2012 at 0:24 review Close votes
Aug 25, 2012 at 3:04
S Aug 14, 2012 at 0:24 review Low quality answers
Aug 24, 2012 at 3:04
Aug 6, 2012 at 1:47 answer added Fortsaint timeline score: 3
Jun 29, 2012 at 14:08 comment added Yvan Velenik No, it is considered irrelevant today. See, e.g., this paper. Of course, this does not imply that the problem of the foundations of statistical physics has been settled (in particular, the proper interpretation of probabilities in the theory).
Jun 29, 2012 at 9:59 comment added user10176 Well, for finite bounded closed systems, there's Poincare recurrences...
Jun 29, 2012 at 9:54 history edited Qmechanic CC BY-SA 3.0
retagged; removed greeting;
Jun 29, 2012 at 9:53 comment added Qmechanic Possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/q/19970/2451
Jun 29, 2012 at 8:55 history asked Jack Layton CC BY-SA 3.0