Skip to main content
Physics

Return to Question

replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

HereHere, it mentions that the total number of electrons in the observable universe is around 10^80, while thisthis states that the total number of baryons are again, around 10^80. This article says that the total number of neutrinos seems to be around 1.2*10^89. It follows that the total number of neutrinos are a billion times more than the total number of baryons and electrons combined. Is this ballpark estimate correct ?

Here, it mentions that the total number of electrons in the observable universe is around 10^80, while this states that the total number of baryons are again, around 10^80. This article says that the total number of neutrinos seems to be around 1.2*10^89. It follows that the total number of neutrinos are a billion times more than the total number of baryons and electrons combined. Is this ballpark estimate correct ?

Here, it mentions that the total number of electrons in the observable universe is around 10^80, while this states that the total number of baryons are again, around 10^80. This article says that the total number of neutrinos seems to be around 1.2*10^89. It follows that the total number of neutrinos are a billion times more than the total number of baryons and electrons combined. Is this ballpark estimate correct ?

Source Link
Daud
Daud
  • 415
  • 1
  • 3
  • 12

Is it true that neutrinos are billions of times more than all baryonic matter and electrons?

Here, it mentions that the total number of electrons in the observable universe is around 10^80, while this states that the total number of baryons are again, around 10^80. This article says that the total number of neutrinos seems to be around 1.2*10^89. It follows that the total number of neutrinos are a billion times more than the total number of baryons and electrons combined. Is this ballpark estimate correct ?