Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 1, 2016 at 5:14 vote accept Spoilt Milk
Nov 30, 2016 at 23:42 answer added Emilio Pisanty timeline score: 1
Nov 30, 2016 at 14:11 history undeleted Spoilt Milk
Nov 29, 2016 at 18:48 history deleted Spoilt Milk via Vote
Nov 29, 2016 at 18:35 comment added Spoilt Milk @ACuriousMind thanks for that info, I wouldn't have posted the question if I had known this before. Sorry to waste your time by asking a question from an unreliable source. I'll go ahead and delete it, if that's fine.
Nov 29, 2016 at 18:28 comment added ACuriousMind Note that rxiv.org is an alias of viXra.org (and not of arXiv.org, as one might first think), which is generally not seen as a reliable source for mainstream scientific information.
Nov 29, 2016 at 16:31 comment added Spoilt Milk Ruslan, I have edited the question, @Gert here is the link to the article I read: rxiv.org/abs/1405.0311
Nov 29, 2016 at 16:29 history edited Spoilt Milk CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 171 characters in body
Nov 29, 2016 at 16:08 comment added Gert "Also why does the spherical solution of Schrödinger’s wave equation not agree with any experiment (I read this part somewhere, not my opinion)?" I'd love to see where you read that: the properties (for instance) of hydrogen as predicted by QM have been verified countless times experimentally. The agreement is outstanding.
Nov 29, 2016 at 16:03 history edited Gert CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Nov 29, 2016 at 15:58 comment added ACuriousMind The wavefunction $\psi$ is not a field. Regardless, what is bad about $k$ being a function of $r$? It just means that $\psi$ is not a plane wave that would have a fixed "wavenumber" that you can associate to it.
Nov 29, 2016 at 15:49 comment added Ruslan There're three questions in one. It's not a good fit for this site. Please edit your question to leave a single question in it.
Nov 29, 2016 at 15:39 history asked Spoilt Milk CC BY-SA 3.0