Skip to main content

Why does one separately study the representationrepresentations of the Lorentz group and the Poincaré group, instead of directly and only studying the representations of the PoincarePoincaré group? After all, the Lagrangians of field theory should be not only be Lorentz invariant but should also be PoincarePoincaré invariant.

Why does one separately study the representation of the Lorentz group instead of directly and only studying the representations of the Poincare group? After all, the Lagrangians of field theory should be not only be Lorentz invariant but should also be Poincare invariant.

Why does one separately study the representations of the Lorentz group and the Poincaré group, instead of directly and only studying the representations of the Poincaré group? After all, the Lagrangians of field theory should not only be Lorentz invariant but should also be Poincaré invariant.

edited tags; edited title
Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.7k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

Why does one study the reresentationsrepresentations of Lorentz group instead of studying only the representations of Poincare group?

Source Link
SRS
  • 27.2k
  • 12
  • 106
  • 341

Why does one study the reresentations of Lorentz group instead of studying only the representations of Poincare group?

Why does one separately study the representation of the Lorentz group instead of directly and only studying the representations of the Poincare group? After all, the Lagrangians of field theory should be not only be Lorentz invariant but should also be Poincare invariant.