Questions tagged [poincare-symmetry]
The poincare-symmetry tag has no usage guidance.
278
questions
2
votes
1
answer
75
views
Poincare invariant Lagrangian?
I only see it mentioned that we want Lorentz invariant Lagrangians in quantum field theory, but I would expect that we additionally also need translational invariance, i.e. Poincare invariance. After ...
1
vote
2
answers
49
views
Extending Wigner's Classification with Gauge Symmetry
In Wigner's Classification, as far as I understand, one uses unitary irreps. of the Poincare group for treating an elementary particle, since then mass $m$ and helicity $h$ emerge naturally as ...
2
votes
0
answers
33
views
Is every unitary representation of the Poincare group a direct sum of Wigner's irreducible representations?
Is Wigner's classification of unitary irreducible representations of the Poincare group [1] sufficient for constructing all unitary representations of the Poincare group by taking direct sums?
The ...
1
vote
0
answers
30
views
Correlation function of 4-currents on a general QFT
Given $V^\mu(x)$ a 4-current of a general unitary, Poincaré invariant QFT, I need to show that the correlation function:
$$iC_{\mu\nu}(x-y) = \langle {\tilde{0}}|T\left[V_\mu(x)V_{\nu}^\dagger(y)\...
0
votes
2
answers
51
views
Does the location of the Hilbert space of momentum eigenstates in QFT change under time translations and boosts?
I have two questions concerning Wigner's transformation law for irreps of the Poincare group:
\begin{equation}
U[\Lambda,\vec{a}]\vert p,\sigma\rangle=e^{ip\cdot a}D_{\sigma'\sigma}[\Lambda;p]\vert \...
0
votes
1
answer
32
views
Spin as Poincaré invariant label
I was thinking about how we construct unitary representations for the Poincaré group in the case of massive particles. We move to a frame where the particle is at rest, and here the little group that ...
0
votes
0
answers
34
views
Space-Time Symmetries and Scaling
Typically, when a course examines symmetries of space-time and their consequences (e.g. symmetries of Lagrangians and conserved quantities), either the Lorentz group or the Poincaré group are ...
0
votes
0
answers
40
views
Proof for any Propagator = Klein-Gordon Green's Function times Spin-Projector
I have seen a sketch for this some time ago, but I'm unable to find it again.
Consider a wave function $\phi^{\mu_1\ldots\mu_n}$ who satisfies the eigenvalue equations of the two Casimir operators of ...
1
vote
0
answers
61
views
Wigner's classification
Could someone offer a very clear explanation of Wigner's classification of particles as infinite-dimensional unitary representations of the Poincare group?
0
votes
1
answer
58
views
Spin generator of massless fields
How can I derive an expression for the spin generator $S^{\mu\nu}$ of massless fields (preferably fermions) and show, in this way, that the $S^{0i},\ i=1,2,3$ components of the spin generator vanish??
0
votes
0
answers
91
views
Representation of Poincaré group and quantum field
How can we understand the quantum field $$\phi(x) = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3\sqrt{2E}} ( a_p e^{-ipx}+ a^\dagger_p e^{ipx}) ,$$ where $ a_p$ and $a^\dagger_p$ are creation annihilation operators, ...
2
votes
0
answers
22
views
Method of Induced Representations for inhomogeneous $SO^+(p,q)$ group
In Weinberg Chapter $2$, he classifies all the irreducible unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group $SO^+(1,3)$ via the method of induced representations. Can a similar analysis be ...
1
vote
1
answer
114
views
Commutators in Poincare algebra
Consider the method of induced representations for the Poincare algebra, i.e. given a field $\phi$ (which need not be a scalar field despite its notation), we have the commutator $$[J^{\mu\nu},\phi(0)]...
0
votes
2
answers
113
views
Needs of unitary representation for QFT
Weinberg book states the following (pg. 231):
"There is no problem in working with non-unitary representations, because the objects we are now concerned with are fields, not wave functions, and ...
3
votes
1
answer
61
views
Are there finite dimensional representations of the Poincaré algebra with non-nilpotent momentum generators?
The matrix representations of the Poincaré algebra that I am familiar with, have a nilpotent set of momentum generators: $p^\mu p^\nu = 0$. I am wondering whether it is possible to have finite ...
3
votes
1
answer
94
views
Is spectrum of Hamiltonian all you need?
This should be well-known, but I don't seem to know it...
Quantum mechanics is defined by a Hamiltonian, and a Hamiltonian (as any Hermitian operator) is determined by its spectrum. Hence, it seems as ...
5
votes
1
answer
181
views
Relativistic many-particle dynamics as a field theory subsector
In more than 2 dimensions, the so-called "no-interaction theorem" of Leutwyler (see this article for a proof) states that naive attempts at constructing $n$-particle classical relativistic ...
1
vote
1
answer
107
views
What is the relationship between the Galilean group and the Poincaré group?
What is the relationship between the Galilean group and the Poincaré group?
Are they siblings within the Lie group? Or does the Poincaré group contain the Galilean group as a subgroup?
I'm not so much ...
3
votes
0
answers
80
views
Why should the infinite-dimensional representation of Poincare group induced by the unitary representation of little group be unitary?
In Weinberg's Quantum Field Theory (Vol. I, pages 64-67) it is stated that a unitary representation of little group induces a unitary representation of the Poincare group. But I don't understand how ...
2
votes
2
answers
66
views
Sign error in representation of angular momentum on fields
Consider a field $\phi$ that belongs to a representation of the Poincaré algebra. We assume that under translations $\phi\mapsto\phi'$, where $\phi'(x')=\phi(x)$. This fixes the action of the momentum ...
1
vote
1
answer
118
views
Intuitive understanding of single-particle states in the interacting QFTs
I am trying to understand to which realistic objects one can apply the definition of single-particle states as irreducible representations of the Poincare group. Let me start with a couple of ...
4
votes
1
answer
119
views
Wigner classification of particles vs generic Hamiltonian spectrum
Wigner tells us we should associate infinite dimensional unitary irreps of the Poincaré group with particle states. His classification using eigenvectors of the spacetime generators $P^\mu$ and the ...
1
vote
0
answers
53
views
What combination of Poincare generators can be used to transform to a uniformly accelerating frame?
Is there a combination of Poincare generators which can be used to transform from an inertial frame in Minkowski space to a uniformly accelerating frame? i.e Are there some co-efficients (probably ...
1
vote
0
answers
109
views
The specific derivation of Poincare algebra
In my note it says for Poincare transform $\delta x^\mu=a^\mu+\omega^\mu_\nu x^\nu$:
to derive the commutator relation of algebra, we consider 2 consecutive transforms
$$\delta_2\delta_1 x^\mu=(\...
0
votes
0
answers
48
views
What's the difference between the spin matrix and the generator of the Poincaré algebra?
Searching for articles and research papers on the Poincaré gauge theory, I found https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0302040 a good three lectures of Blagojevich on the subject.
So straight away on the second ...
3
votes
0
answers
109
views
Representations of the Poincaré group
I am currently trying to understand the representations of the conformal group. I am following the script by J. D. Qualls.
At page 29, the author finds the effect of $L_{\mu\nu}$ by "studying the ...
4
votes
1
answer
148
views
The Cartan sub algebra and Killing form of the Poincaré algebra
Doing some studies on Group theory, I worked Frederic Schuller's lectures on youtube where he classifies all semisimple Lie algebras by the Dynkin's diagrams; I should say it was interesting.
Trying ...
2
votes
0
answers
103
views
Lorentz Transformation of massive Spin-1 fields
First, let me give a summary of the relevant background:
In the QFT book by Schwartz, in Chapter 8.2.2, we derive a Lagrangian for a massive Spin-1 field:
$$
\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2} A_{\mu} \square A_{...
0
votes
1
answer
100
views
Little Group of massive particles in moving frame
My understanding of the little group till now was, that we take some standard-momentum and define the little Group as the subgroup of the Poincaré group that leaves this standard-momentum invariant. E....
0
votes
0
answers
35
views
Equivalent representations of Poincare group
This question is regarding the paperA wavelet transform for the Poincaré group
We have the Poincare group action as
$$U(a, \Lambda)\psi(x, t)=\Psi(\Lambda^{-1}(x-a))$$
Then the author defines another ...
1
vote
0
answers
44
views
In what meaningful way can we talk about the generators of the super-Poincaré algebra being "spinors" or "4-vectors" because of their indices?
It is often presented without much justification that the generators of the super-Poincaré algebra carry indices that imply they are elements of a representation space of the Poincaré algebra. In ...
5
votes
1
answer
116
views
Coleman–Mandula theorem and its assumptions on QFT
The description of the Coleman–Mandula theorem on Wikipedia starts with the following assumptions:
Every quantum field theory satisfying the assumptions,
Below any mass M, there is only a finite ...
1
vote
1
answer
63
views
Translation of generators when derive representations of Poincare group on fields
As stated in section 4.2.1 of Di Francesco's book on conformal field theory. In order to find out representation of Poincare group on fields, we can start by studying the subgroup that leaves the ...
4
votes
1
answer
242
views
Spin in Lorentz group and Poincare group
I am currently learning representations of Lorentz group and Poincare group by Harald's Introduction to Supersymmetry Chap.1. I have 2 questions about the definition of spin.
Provided that finite ...
8
votes
0
answers
159
views
Systematically constructing a Lagrangian with given Poincare representations for particles
In one approach to constructing field theories, we begin with some desired particle content (e.g. a massive spin-1 particle), and then we construct a corresponding classical Lagrangian (e.g. the Proca ...
3
votes
0
answers
118
views
Commutation relation of four vectors [closed]
I was trying to prove that: $$[P_\mu, J_{\rho \sigma}] = i(\eta_{\mu \sigma} P_\rho - \eta_{\mu \rho} P_\sigma) $$
$\textbf{Attempt}$
$$\begin{align}
[P_\mu, J_{\rho \sigma}] = [P_\mu, x_\rho P_\sigma ...
3
votes
0
answers
107
views
Pauli-Lubanski square operator
The Pauli-Lubanski operator is given by:
$$ W_\mu = -\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{\mu \nu \rho \sigma} J^{\nu \rho}P^{\sigma}$$
Thus the square operator is given by:
$$ W_\mu W^\mu = W^2 = -\frac{1}{4} \...
2
votes
0
answers
37
views
What is the role of the mass Casimir invariant in Galilean and what it's actual role in special relativity? [closed]
What is the role of the (mass) Casimir invariant of the algebra of relativistic symmetries in Galilean and what it's actual role in special relativity?
2
votes
1
answer
74
views
Does every Hilbert space contain the generators of the Poincaré algebra?
I'll pose my question in the form of a statement, and you can tell me if there's anything wrong with what I say:
Every Hilbert space which describes a system that obeys the "fundamental ...
3
votes
0
answers
143
views
No-interaction theorem in classical relativistic mechanics
In classical relativistic Hamiltonian mechanics there is a so-called "no-interaction theorem" (see, for example, this article for a proof). Roughly, it states that if we have an $N$-body ...
3
votes
1
answer
203
views
Poincaré group and the Bargmann theorem
In Valter Moretti's book (Spectral Theory and Quantum Mechanics), page 578, it is said that the Poincaré group is semisimple, but Wikipedia says otherwise.
Moretti mentions it in order to ensure that ...
3
votes
2
answers
142
views
Wightman axiom 2: what kind of representation?
Both in Wikipedia and on page 98 of Streater, Wightman, PCT, Spin and Statistics and all that, the second axiom postulates that a field must transform according to a representation of the Poincaré ...
0
votes
1
answer
276
views
How does parity act on relativistic one-particle states?
Please allow me to set the context based on my understanding before I present the question.
In quantum field theory, one-particle states are the basis states of the infinite-dimensional unitary ...
0
votes
1
answer
160
views
Square of Pauli-Lubanski operator
I am following Ashok Das QFT book (pg. 152-153) on the calculation of the Pauli Lubanski operator.
The Pauli Lubanski vector operator is defined as $$W^\mu=\frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda\rho}P_\nu ...
1
vote
0
answers
170
views
Little-group and spinor helicity
I'm struggling a bit to understand the little group in the context of massless momenta and the spinor-helicity formalism.
I'll clarify notation and my understanding through a brief recap, and put the ...
0
votes
1
answer
110
views
How to define the components of the Poincare group?
I know that the Poincare group/inhomogeneous Lorentz group can be defined as:
$$
x^\mu = (t,-x) \\
t \rightarrow t^\prime = \gamma x + \delta t + b^0 \\
x \rightarrow x^\prime = \alpha x + \beta t + b^...
0
votes
1
answer
179
views
Casimir of $SO(3)$, $SO(2)$, $IO(1,3)$, $T(4)$
It is known that $SO(3)$, a semisimple group of rank 1, has one Casimir $J^2$, and one can use this information to classify its irreps with the eigenvalues of $J^2$ and $J_3$: $(j,m)$. Now, only $j$ ...
1
vote
1
answer
36
views
Question for ${\cal N}=1$ supersymmetry representations
Please see this lecture note: https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1491.
In section "2.2.5 Massless supermultiplet"
the author defines a Casimir and says it is zero.
How can we confirm it?
We take the ...
1
vote
1
answer
288
views
On Poincare group’s Casimir operators
We’ve defined Casimir operator for a group as an operator which commutes with all generators of that group. For the Poincare group we’ve found two Casimir operators: $p_\mu p^\mu$ and $W_\mu W^\mu$ ...
0
votes
2
answers
184
views
Symmetry and Coordinate invariance
How are spacetime symmetries different from simple general coordinate invariance?
Physical laws should be coordinate independent. Are Poincare invariances not simply changing coordinates?