Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/700256817067225088
added 27 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
user36790
user36790

Van der WallsWaals equation

In the Van der Waals equation,

enter image description here$$\left(p+\frac{a'}{v^2}\right)(v-b')= kT$$

enter image description here

enter image description hereThe The excluded volume b is not just equal to the volume occupied by the solid, finite-sized particles, but actually four times that volume. To see this, we must realize that a particle is surrounded by a sphere of radius 2r (two times the original radius) that is forbidden for the centers of the other particles. If the distance between two particle centers were to be smaller than 2r, it would mean that the two particles penetrate each other, which, by definition, hard spheres are unable to do.

enter image description here

I am not getting what is the isseueissue with this? Atoms are still not overlapping.

We could simply replace the b=Volume of each sphere*No.of atoms$b=\textrm{Volume of each sphere}\cdot\textrm{No.of atoms}$

Is my visulisationvisualisation incorrect?

Van der Walls equation

In the Van der Waals equation,

enter image description here

enter image description hereThe excluded volume b is not just equal to the volume occupied by the solid, finite-sized particles, but actually four times that volume. To see this, we must realize that a particle is surrounded by a sphere of radius 2r (two times the original radius) that is forbidden for the centers of the other particles. If the distance between two particle centers were to be smaller than 2r, it would mean that the two particles penetrate each other, which, by definition, hard spheres are unable to do.

enter image description here

I am not getting what is the isseue with this? Atoms are still not overlapping.

We could simply replace the b=Volume of each sphere*No.of atoms

Is my visulisation incorrect?

Van der Waals equation

In the Van der Waals equation,

$$\left(p+\frac{a'}{v^2}\right)(v-b')= kT$$

enter image description here

The excluded volume b is not just equal to the volume occupied by the solid, finite-sized particles, but actually four times that volume. To see this, we must realize that a particle is surrounded by a sphere of radius 2r (two times the original radius) that is forbidden for the centers of the other particles. If the distance between two particle centers were to be smaller than 2r, it would mean that the two particles penetrate each other, which, by definition, hard spheres are unable to do.

enter image description here

I am not getting what is the issue with this? Atoms are still not overlapping.

We could simply replace the $b=\textrm{Volume of each sphere}\cdot\textrm{No.of atoms}$

Is my visualisation incorrect?

Source Link
user106015
user106015

Van der Walls equation

In the Van der Waals equation,

enter image description here

enter image description hereThe excluded volume b is not just equal to the volume occupied by the solid, finite-sized particles, but actually four times that volume. To see this, we must realize that a particle is surrounded by a sphere of radius 2r (two times the original radius) that is forbidden for the centers of the other particles. If the distance between two particle centers were to be smaller than 2r, it would mean that the two particles penetrate each other, which, by definition, hard spheres are unable to do.

enter image description here

I am not getting what is the isseue with this? Atoms are still not overlapping.

We could simply replace the b=Volume of each sphere*No.of atoms

Is my visulisation incorrect?