Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Urb
  • 2.7k
  • 4
  • 14
  • 26

Undergraduate classical mechanics introduces both Lagrangians and Hamiltonians, while undergrad quantum mechanics seems to only use the Hamiltonian. But particle physics, and more generally quantum field theory seem to only use the Lagrangian, e.g. you hear about the Klein-GordanGordon Lagrangian, Dirac Lagrangian, Standard Model Lagrangian and so on.

Why is there a mismatch here? Why does it seem like only Hamiltonians are used in undergraduate quantum mechanics, but only LagrangainsLagrangians are used in quantum field theory?

Undergraduate classical mechanics introduces both Lagrangians and Hamiltonians, while undergrad quantum mechanics seems to only use the Hamiltonian. But particle physics, and more generally quantum field theory seem to only use the Lagrangian, e.g. you hear about the Klein-Gordan Lagrangian, Dirac Lagrangian, Standard Model Lagrangian and so on.

Why is there a mismatch here? Why does it seem like only Hamiltonians are used in undergraduate quantum mechanics, but only Lagrangains are used in quantum field theory?

Undergraduate classical mechanics introduces both Lagrangians and Hamiltonians, while undergrad quantum mechanics seems to only use the Hamiltonian. But particle physics, and more generally quantum field theory seem to only use the Lagrangian, e.g. you hear about the Klein-Gordon Lagrangian, Dirac Lagrangian, Standard Model Lagrangian and so on.

Why is there a mismatch here? Why does it seem like only Hamiltonians are used in undergraduate quantum mechanics, but only Lagrangians are used in quantum field theory?

deleted 98 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
knzhou
  • 105.1k
  • 24
  • 297
  • 494

Why not usinguse the Lagrangian, instead of the Hamiltonian, in non relativisticnonrelativistic QM?

When we studiedUndergraduate classical mechanics onintroduces both Lagrangians and Hamiltonians, while undergrad quantum mechanics seems to only use the undergraduate levelHamiltonian. But particle physics, onand more generally quantum field theory seem to only use the level of TaylorLagrangian, we covered Hamiltonian as well ase.g. you hear about the Klein-Gordan Lagrangian mechanics, Dirac Lagrangian, Standard Model Lagrangian and so on.

Now when we studied QM, on the level of Griffiths, we always dealt with Hamiltonians not Lagrangians. Why is thatthere a mismatch here? I know that QFT and particle physics rely instead on Lagrangian!!Why does it seem like only Hamiltonians are used in undergraduate quantum mechanics, but only Lagrangains are used in quantum field theory?

  1. Could someone provide some insights on why, it seems that, "only" Hamiltonians are used in undergrad QM.

  2. Also it would be great if providing some insights on why "only" Lagrangians appear in high energy physics (KG Lagrangian, Dirac Lagrangian, Standard Model Lagrangian...etc)

Why not using Lagrangian, instead of Hamiltonian, in non relativistic QM?

When we studied classical mechanics on the undergraduate level, on the level of Taylor, we covered Hamiltonian as well as Lagrangian mechanics.

Now when we studied QM, on the level of Griffiths, we always dealt with Hamiltonians not Lagrangians. Why is that? I know that QFT and particle physics rely instead on Lagrangian!!

  1. Could someone provide some insights on why, it seems that, "only" Hamiltonians are used in undergrad QM.

  2. Also it would be great if providing some insights on why "only" Lagrangians appear in high energy physics (KG Lagrangian, Dirac Lagrangian, Standard Model Lagrangian...etc)

Why not use the Lagrangian, instead of the Hamiltonian, in nonrelativistic QM?

Undergraduate classical mechanics introduces both Lagrangians and Hamiltonians, while undergrad quantum mechanics seems to only use the Hamiltonian. But particle physics, and more generally quantum field theory seem to only use the Lagrangian, e.g. you hear about the Klein-Gordan Lagrangian, Dirac Lagrangian, Standard Model Lagrangian and so on.

Why is there a mismatch here? Why does it seem like only Hamiltonians are used in undergraduate quantum mechanics, but only Lagrangains are used in quantum field theory?

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/176454470127976448
retagged;
Source Link
Qmechanic
  • 212.9k
  • 48
  • 589
  • 2.3k

When we studied classical mechanics on the undergraduate level, on the level of Taylor, we covered Hamiltonian as well as Lagrangian mechanics.

Now when we studied QM, on the level of Griffiths, we always dealt with Hamiltonians not Lagrangians. Why is that? I know that QFT and particle physics rely instead on Lagrangian!!

1-Could someone provide some insights on why, it seems that, "only" Hamiltonians are used in undergrad QM.

2-Also it would be great if providing some insights on why "only" Lagrangians appear in high energy physics (KG Lagrangian, Dirac Lagrangian, Standard Model Lagrangian...etc)

  1. Could someone provide some insights on why, it seems that, "only" Hamiltonians are used in undergrad QM.

  2. Also it would be great if providing some insights on why "only" Lagrangians appear in high energy physics (KG Lagrangian, Dirac Lagrangian, Standard Model Lagrangian...etc)

When we studied classical mechanics on the undergraduate level, on the level of Taylor, we covered Hamiltonian as well as Lagrangian mechanics.

Now when we studied QM, on the level of Griffiths, we always dealt with Hamiltonians not Lagrangians. Why is that? I know that QFT and particle physics rely instead on Lagrangian!!

1-Could someone provide some insights on why, it seems that, "only" Hamiltonians are used in undergrad QM.

2-Also it would be great if providing some insights on why "only" Lagrangians appear in high energy physics (KG Lagrangian, Dirac Lagrangian, Standard Model Lagrangian...etc)

When we studied classical mechanics on the undergraduate level, on the level of Taylor, we covered Hamiltonian as well as Lagrangian mechanics.

Now when we studied QM, on the level of Griffiths, we always dealt with Hamiltonians not Lagrangians. Why is that? I know that QFT and particle physics rely instead on Lagrangian!!

  1. Could someone provide some insights on why, it seems that, "only" Hamiltonians are used in undergrad QM.

  2. Also it would be great if providing some insights on why "only" Lagrangians appear in high energy physics (KG Lagrangian, Dirac Lagrangian, Standard Model Lagrangian...etc)

Source Link
Revo
  • 17.3k
  • 28
  • 99
  • 151
Loading